Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211587 > unrolled thread
| Started by | juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-20 20:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 20:00 +0200
Re: Performance of mu in buster Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200
Re: Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200
| From | juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-20 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Performance of mu in buster |
| Message-ID | <ym1Oh-7TM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi all, I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my memory and indexes several hours, even for updating with new mail. Anyone experiencing the same? TIA juh
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ym27D-8fJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211587 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
juh [2019-07-20T19:44:47+02] wrote: > I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly > 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to > wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that > indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my > memory and indexes several hours, even for updating with new mail. > > Anyone experiencing the same? I use Notmuch which uses libxapian and libgmime, just like Mu (maildir-utils). Since the indexing and database backends are the same you could try comparing Mu and Notmuch. I have only about 35000 mails and with those Notmuch is really fast. The initial indexing takes some minutes but after that everything is fast. -- /// OpenPGP key: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450 // https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=tlikonen@iki.fi / https://keybase.io/tlikonen https://github.com/tlikonen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ym3Q5-11J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #211587 |
juh writes: > Hi all, > > I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly > 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to > wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that > indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my > memory and indexes several hours, even for updating with new mail. Of course, I can reduce the index time with .noupdate files in archive folder but the process is terminated if I make a full rebuild. juh -- Soziale Plastik. Die Kunst der Allmende Essay zum 30. Todestag von Joseph Beuys http://www.amazon.de/dp/1523458763/ Taschenbuch, 130 Seiten, EUR 9,90
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web