Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #210191
| From | Dekks Herton <dekkzz78@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster |
| Date | 2019-06-21 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ybrCp-5cy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yaRyW-7qm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yaRSh-7MG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <yaYK5-3uf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yboEy-2HF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> writes: > Hi, > > On 20/6/19 4:28 pm, Reco wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 01:03:50AM +0200, Matthew Crews wrote: >>> On 6/19/19 3:30 PM, Lazar Tadić wrote: >>>> Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular >>>> arch on Debian. There's no way it will be dropped even after >>>> Buster. > > I would think this would be due to misunderstanding by new users more > than anything else. > > Most, if not all 32 bit arch machines are probably going to consume > far more energy than newer machines of far greater capability. That > is, it probably doesn't make any financial sense to continue running > an old 32 bit machine. > > And if it is user misunderstanding, then many of those probably have > suitable 64 bit machines anyway. > > Cheers > A. > In the corp world that's very true Andrew re: energy but you under estimate the amount of 32bit machines still running under desks, connected to devices in workshops, in homes doing stuff out of sight. -- Regards......... PGP Fingerprint: 3DF8 311C 4740 B5BC 3867 72DF 1050 452F 9BCE BA00
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-18 23:40 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-06-20 00:40 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Lazar Tadić <lazar.tadic34@gmail.com> - 2019-06-20 00:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-20 01:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-06-20 08:30 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2019-06-21 12:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-21 13:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Dekks Herton <dekkzz78@gmail.com> - 2019-06-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-06-21 15:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-21 16:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2019-06-21 16:20 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-06-21 16:40 +0200
csiph-web