Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #210183
| From | Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster |
| Date | 2019-06-21 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yboEy-2HF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yaRyW-7qm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yaRSh-7MG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <yaYK5-3uf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 20/6/19 4:28 pm, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 01:03:50AM +0200, Matthew Crews wrote: >> On 6/19/19 3:30 PM, Lazar Tadić wrote: >>> Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular >>> arch on Debian. There's no way it will be dropped even after >>> Buster. I would think this would be due to misunderstanding by new users more than anything else. Most, if not all 32 bit arch machines are probably going to consume far more energy than newer machines of far greater capability. That is, it probably doesn't make any financial sense to continue running an old 32 bit machine. And if it is user misunderstanding, then many of those probably have suitable 64 bit machines anyway. Cheers A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXQyrhAAKCRCoFmvLt+/i +8okAP46Ge/vbgNa52qDBpHcuSGwBS5vTj1O3khOMCEAaSJmJAEAwTPdiABnb330 nILXoYK80KBgFdJvmZSRQHyXjQZZICk= =zkcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-18 23:40 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-06-20 00:40 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Lazar Tadić <lazar.tadic34@gmail.com> - 2019-06-20 00:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-20 01:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-06-20 08:30 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2019-06-21 12:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2019-06-21 13:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Dekks Herton <dekkzz78@gmail.com> - 2019-06-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-06-21 15:50 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-06-21 16:10 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2019-06-21 16:20 +0200
Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2019-06-21 16:40 +0200
csiph-web