Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #209779

Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?)

From deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?)
Date 2019-06-09 22:30 +0200
Message-ID <y7cBX-5cy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xGnln-4CK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <y6GC6-344-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y6KcG-5eQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <y70r7-6qa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Andrei POPESCU wrote:

> Debian is typically using LTS kernels for stable releases, so buster
> will most likely release with 4.19.

This is a good choice - running custom 4.19 I can say that I will not intend
to upgrade it in near feature.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2019-03-27 21:30 +0100
  Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 12:20 +0200
    Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2019-06-08 16:10 +0200
      Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 09:30 +0200
        Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 22:30 +0200

csiph-web