Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #209757
| From | Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) |
| Date | 2019-06-08 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <y6KcG-5eQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xGnln-4CK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <y6GC6-344-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Il 08/06/19 12:18, Andrei POPESCU ha scritto: > On Mi, 27 mar 19, 21:22:18, Andrea Borgia wrote: >> 2) maybe I am not using the proper keywords but I can't seem to find >> information on Debian kernel policy, specifically: when does a new kernel >> from upstream enter "unstable"? > > Usually quite soon after the upstream kernel is released as "stable". > > During the freeze only packages meant for the next stable should be > uploaded to unstable (as per Release Team policy), so new versions might > go to experimental or not be packaged at all until after the release. "Unstable" still has 4.19 whereas 5.0.x and 5.1.x are marked as stable upstream, so I guess we'll see them in the next release. Thanks, Andrea.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2019-03-27 21:30 +0100
Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 12:20 +0200
Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2019-06-08 16:10 +0200
Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 09:30 +0200
Re: kernel policy vs bug handling (how to followup #919227 ?) deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 22:30 +0200
csiph-web