Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #208346

Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?

From Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?
Date 2019-05-07 13:40 +0200
Message-ID <xV6BY-2Yo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xTWEF-um-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xU1l0-3hV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 04.05.19 13:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Erik Christiansen (2019-05-04 08:43:53)
> >  There doesn't seem to be an option for pmount to mount at
> >  /media/label_read_from_the_media
...
> I don't personally use pmount since some years, but that sure sounds 
> like a nice suggestion: Please consider filing as a bugreport against 
> pmount with severity "wishlist".

Hmmm, reportbug says:

Your version (0.9.23-2) of pmount appears to be out of date.
The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive:
  experimental: 0.9.99-alpha-1
  unstable: 0.9.23-3+b2
Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? N

but

# apt-get update
# apt-get install pmount

gives:

pmount is already the newest version.

so I'd probably have to move from wheezy to something newer to be up to
date on that utility. No time for that now.

The nifty pmount feature becomes unnecessary if I instead disable the
automounter, eliminating label-defined mountpoints. But:

# apt-get install dconf-editor      # gives:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 dconf-editor : Depends: libdconf1 (>= 0.25.1) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.55.1) but 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 is to be installed
                Depends: libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.22.0) but 3.4.2-7+deb7u1 is to be installed

so the easiest way might just be to remove nautilus, as it's never been
used here. The gnome DE wouldn't fall over without it?  

Erik

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-04 08:50 +0200
  Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-04 13:50 +0200
    Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-06 15:10 +0200
      Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-06 16:00 +0200
        Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2019-05-07 02:20 +0200
          Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 06:10 +0200
            Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 14:50 +0200
              Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-07 15:10 +0200
                Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-08 05:30 +0200
          Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-07 14:20 +0200
            Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2019-05-19 07:10 +0200
          Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-07 21:00 +0200
            Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> - 2019-05-08 08:10 +0200
              Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-08 18:40 +0200
                Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> - 2019-05-08 20:10 +0200
    Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps  be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 13:40 +0200
      Re: Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could  perhaps be of greater utility? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-07 14:00 +0200
  Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-11 15:40 +0200
    Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-12 10:00 +0200
      Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 14:50 +0200
        Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-12 15:40 +0200
          Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 21:30 +0200
          Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-15 06:40 +0200
      Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 15:00 +0200
      Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-13 15:10 +0200

csiph-web