Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #208346
| From | Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? |
| Date | 2019-05-07 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xV6BY-2Yo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xTWEF-um-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xU1l0-3hV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04.05.19 13:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Erik Christiansen (2019-05-04 08:43:53)
> > There doesn't seem to be an option for pmount to mount at
> > /media/label_read_from_the_media
...
> I don't personally use pmount since some years, but that sure sounds
> like a nice suggestion: Please consider filing as a bugreport against
> pmount with severity "wishlist".
Hmmm, reportbug says:
Your version (0.9.23-2) of pmount appears to be out of date.
The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive:
experimental: 0.9.99-alpha-1
unstable: 0.9.23-3+b2
Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? N
but
# apt-get update
# apt-get install pmount
gives:
pmount is already the newest version.
so I'd probably have to move from wheezy to something newer to be up to
date on that utility. No time for that now.
The nifty pmount feature becomes unnecessary if I instead disable the
automounter, eliminating label-defined mountpoints. But:
# apt-get install dconf-editor # gives:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
dconf-editor : Depends: libdconf1 (>= 0.25.1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.55.1) but 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 is to be installed
Depends: libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.22.0) but 3.4.2-7+deb7u1 is to be installed
so the easiest way might just be to remove nautilus, as it's never been
used here. The gnome DE wouldn't fall over without it?
Erik
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-04 08:50 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-04 13:50 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-06 15:10 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-06 16:00 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2019-05-07 02:20 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 06:10 +0200
Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 14:50 +0200
Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-07 15:10 +0200
Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-08 05:30 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-07 14:20 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2019-05-19 07:10 +0200
Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-07 21:00 +0200
Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> - 2019-05-08 08:10 +0200
Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-08 18:40 +0200
Re: Shell game? was Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> - 2019-05-08 20:10 +0200
Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-07 13:40 +0200
Re: Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-07 14:00 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-11 15:40 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-12 10:00 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 14:50 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-12 15:40 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 21:30 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-15 06:40 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2019-05-12 15:00 +0200
Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-05-13 15:10 +0200
csiph-web