Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #207763

Re: is xdvi broken?

From rlharris@oplink.net
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: is xdvi broken?
Date 2019-04-22 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <xPCbv-4Ju-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <xPfeV-7uj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <xPfyh-7Bi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <xPwfL-RY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xPzx0-38S-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xPB5M-3UM-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2019.04.22 06:51, Bill Wood wrote:

> Is there a reason not to use pdflatex?  My workflow then is
> = In emacs, save the doc foo.tex
> = switch to a virtual terminal
> = execute "pdflatex foo.tex" (as many times as needed)

Why would it be necessary to execute pdflatex more than once?

> = execute "evince foo.pdf"
> = when desired, select "Print" from the "File options" menu of evince
> = switch back to emacs

But to print from evince requires that I take my hand off the
keyboard and reach for the rodent in order to print.

Kindly forgive my lack of perception, but I do not see why it is
advantageous to introduce into my work routine a PDF file and a PDF
viewer such as evince.

In order to write say, an article, I fire up Emacs, write for a while,
using LaTeX markup, now and then in Emacs executing "Ctrl-x s"
to save the document (I dislike to be interrupted by the auto-save
feature of Emacs).

Occasionally I print out a paper copy of the incomplete article and
move to my reading chair, using a pen to make revisions and correct
typographical errors.  To print a copy, I:

     = use Alt-TAB to switch to a terminal

     = execute "latext foo.tex"
       (if I am running latexmk with the -pcv option,
       this occurs automatically)

     = execute "dvips foo.dvi"
       (if I am running latexmk with the -pcv option,
       this occurs automatically)

     = execute "lpr foo.ps"

     = use Alt-TAB to return to the Emacs screen

Sometimes I simply need to glance briefly at the document in typeset
form, without printing it out on paper.  For this, I:

     = use Alt-TAB to switch to a terminal

     = execute "latext foo.tex"
       (if I am running latexmk with the -pcv option,
       this occurs automatically)

     = use Alt-TAB to advance to the xdvi screen

     = use Alt-TAB to return to the Emacs screen

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 21:10 +0200
  Re: is xdvi broken? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-04-16 21:30 +0200
    Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-16 22:30 +0200
      Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 02:30 +0200
        Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 05:20 +0200
          Re: is xdvi broken? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2019-04-17 19:40 +0200
            Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-17 20:30 +0200
              Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-19 23:20 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 00:40 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 01:20 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-20 03:30 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-20 05:40 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 10:00 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> - 2019-04-20 11:50 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-21 02:50 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 09:40 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-21 10:00 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 03:50 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 07:20 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? Bill Wood <william.wood3@comcast.net> - 2019-04-22 09:00 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? rlharris@oplink.net - 2019-04-22 10:10 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-04-22 10:40 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 21:00 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-04-22 05:20 +0200
                Re: is xdvi broken? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-20 15:00 +0200

csiph-web