Groups > linux.debian.user > #207507

Re: Liquorix kernel?

From	Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Liquorix kernel?
Date	2019-04-15 17:30 +0200
Message-ID	<xNbIv-5om-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<xMYie-5Fz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xN6ps-21U-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 14:42 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
>  A quick glance at tests [1] makes me not bother with Liquorix yet.
> As you can see, performance is a double edged sword, you gain a little more
> responsiveness, but loose on throughput.
> Of course it should be tested for your workload and probably also perform a
> security audit check of all modifications in Liquorix.

	Thanks for the input. To be honest, I'm ok with that trade-off; my
intention is to boot Liquorix for gaming only. For regular workloads I'd stick
with the vanilla kernel.

	Also, I'm sorry for the noobish question, but it's been a really long
time since I've done any kind of kernel work. How do I perform a security check?

> [1] 
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Liquorix-Linux-4.17-Kernel

	Thanks again.

Cheers,
Francisco
-- 
[]'s,

Francisco M Neto

GPG: 4096R/D692FBF0

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Liquorix kernel? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-04-15 03:10 +0200
  Re: Liquorix kernel? "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2019-04-15 11:50 +0200
    Re: Liquorix kernel? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-04-15 17:30 +0200

csiph-web