Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #207450 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-04-15 03:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-04-15 17:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Liquorix kernel? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-04-15 03:10 +0200
Re: Liquorix kernel? "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2019-04-15 11:50 +0200
Re: Liquorix kernel? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-04-15 17:30 +0200
| From | Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-15 03:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Liquorix kernel? |
| Message-ID | <xMYie-5Fz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Greetings! I have just now heard about this custom kernel directed to performance and I was wondering - anyone here has any experience with that? I'd rather just download their .config and compile the kernel from a deb src package, any thoughts? Thanks in advance. Francisco -- []'s, Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> GPG: 4096R/D692FBF0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-15 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xN6ps-21U-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #207450 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 15.04.2019 5:37, Francisco M Neto wrote: > Greetings! > > I have just now heard about this custom kernel directed to > performance and I was wondering - anyone here has any experience with > that? > I'd rather just download their .config and compile the kernel > from a deb src package, any thoughts? > > Thanks in advance. > Francisco > A quick glance at tests [1] makes me not bother with Liquorix yet. As you can see, performance is a double edged sword, you gain a little more responsiveness, but loose on throughput. Of course it should be tested for your workload and probably also perform a security audit check of all modifications in Liquorix. [1] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Liquorix-Linux-4.17-Kernel -- With kindest regards, Alexander. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-15 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xNbIv-5om-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #207468 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 14:42 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > A quick glance at tests [1] makes me not bother with Liquorix yet. > As you can see, performance is a double edged sword, you gain a little more > responsiveness, but loose on throughput. > Of course it should be tested for your workload and probably also perform a > security audit check of all modifications in Liquorix. Thanks for the input. To be honest, I'm ok with that trade-off; my intention is to boot Liquorix for gaming only. For regular workloads I'd stick with the vanilla kernel. Also, I'm sorry for the noobish question, but it's been a really long time since I've done any kind of kernel work. How do I perform a security check? > [1] > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Liquorix-Linux-4.17-Kernel Thanks again. Cheers, Francisco -- []'s, Francisco M Neto GPG: 4096R/D692FBF0
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web