Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198701
| From | Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 |
| Date | 2018-08-13 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wmkLD-6Ct-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wlyH0-3qG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <wmksh-6gQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 08:43:12AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: >On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:41:34AM +0200, Pétùr wrote: >> The new 'su' is useless for me because it cannot launch root program. >> I did the modification in /etc/login.defs and restore the previous >> behavior. However I am concern with the statement " Doing plain 'su' >> is a really bad idea for many reasons". >> >> Could someone explain to me why this is a bad behavior? > >It's not what Red Hat does, and therefore "oooooh, we have to change to >match what Red Hat does". Actually, util-linux is distributed by the Linux Kernel Organization (i.e. the folks at kernel.org). So, yes, Debian has to match what Red Hat does inasmuch as Red Hat uses a Linux kernel and so does Debian. It just makes sense to use the kernel-provided kernel utilities. As an aside, I don't know what the situation is with the *BSD Debians. They presumably don't use util-linux, so I *guess* they're still using su from src:shadow? > >Never mind the fact that it's a completely stupid, intrusive, pointless >change that breaks the behavior that has been working properly in Debian >for decades. Who cares about things working properly, or backward >compatiblity, or common sense? GOTTA MATCH RED HAT! Change should be acceptable IF there is a good reason for it. I'll agree, though, that it's not really been well-communicated how "su -" is better than "su" and why, apparently, the meaning of the two have been swapped over. But if the point is to make things more secure, then that's a perfectly acceptable reason for breakage. > >Users will be confused? SCREW 'EM! GOTTA MATCH RED HAT! > >Scripts will break? SCREW 'EM! GOTTA MATCH FUCKING RED HAT! > >The only reason anyone would think that "plain su is bad" is because >they had to work with Red Hat systems (or perhaps certain BSD-based >systems) where plain su behaves the way testing's su behaves, and >they got used to it. > -- For more information, please reread.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Pétùr <peturvilj@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 11:50 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Stefan Krusche <linux@stefan-krusche.de> - 2018-08-11 12:00 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-11 16:10 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2018-08-11 17:50 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Pétùr <peturvilj@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 18:00 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-08-11 19:10 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-08-11 13:50 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Pétùr <peturvilj@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 18:00 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-08-13 14:50 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-08-13 15:10 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2018-08-13 15:40 +0200
Re: New su behavior in util-linux 2.32 Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-08-14 11:00 +0200
csiph-web