Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #196684

Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster

From Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster
Date 2018-06-14 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <w0E4F-5g1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <w0dHb-5PE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0fSF-73d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0xZf-1hc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0ANr-35X-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0CFA-4hI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Cindy-Sue Causey wrote on 06/14/18 17:44:
> On 6/14/18, Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:40 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>>> Siard wrote on 06/13/18 17:28:
>>>> <snip>
>>>> I took a try and upgraded the xserver-*** packages in testing to
>>>> version 2:1.20.0 taken from unstable.
>>>> It did work; X (started with 'startx') is back, despite the systemd
>>>> packages having version 238.
>>>> It looks like things will be back to normal after the next upgrade
>>>> of X in testing.  Anyway, thanks for responding.
>>>
>>> Which init package do you use? On my systems it's sysvinit-core.
>>
>> systemd at the moment.  sysvinit-core is not installed.
> 
> 
> Just throwing this out there. xinit is mine (on Xfce4). It's always
> high on my to-do list immediately after initial debootstrap installs.
> 
Could it be that you're confusing xinit (which facilitates starting X) and the
system init? I was talking about the system init and that on my systems for this
purpose sysvinit is used and not systemd's init.

<snip>

Regards,
Jörg.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-12 17:10 +0200
  Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-13 15:10 +0200
    [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-13 17:30 +0200
      Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-14 12:50 +0200
        Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in  buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-14 15:50 +0200
          Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:50 +0200
            Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-14 19:20 +0200
            Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in  buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-16 12:10 +0200
              Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2018-06-16 13:20 +0200
              Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2018-06-16 21:30 +0200
                Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in  buster Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 00:30 +0200
                Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in  buster Charlie S <taoquester@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 00:50 +0200
                Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Dominic Knight <dominicknight@gmx.com> - 2018-06-17 05:50 +0200
                Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in  buster Charlie S <taoquester@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 09:10 +0200

csiph-web