Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #196726
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster |
| Date | 2018-06-16 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <w1p3A-67-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <w0fSF-73d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0xZf-1hc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0ANr-35X-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <w0CFA-4hI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <w1gjD-3xX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat 16 Jun 2018 at 12:06:24 +0200, Siard wrote: > Now in some local list, I've heard someone maintain that starting X > with startx is very old, untested, deprecated, certainly in a systemd > environment. A display manager would control various things concerning > your login session in cooperation with systemd. > I've never heard of that. Is it true, should one refrain from using > startx nowadays? Old? Indeed. Prehistoric even. :) That's its charm. Untested? Not at all; many test it all the time Deprecated? By whom? And why? Refrain from using it? It works well on Debian. -- Brian.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-12 17:10 +0200
Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-13 15:10 +0200
[Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-13 17:30 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-14 12:50 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-14 15:50 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:50 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2018-06-14 19:20 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Siard <shiems146@kpnplanet.nl> - 2018-06-16 12:10 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2018-06-16 13:20 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2018-06-16 21:30 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 00:30 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Charlie S <taoquester@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 00:50 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Dominic Knight <dominicknight@gmx.com> - 2018-06-17 05:50 +0200
Re: [Solved, largely] Re: Latest version of X not starting in buster Charlie S <taoquester@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 09:10 +0200
csiph-web