Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #16117
| From | NFN Smith <worldoff9908@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: Pasting photos in html emails |
| Date | 2025-03-21 17:05 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vrkus0$2ln91$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <09cualxkvk.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vri2le$181m$1@dont-email.me> <shd63fwx141j.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
VanguardLH wrote: > "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote: > > ALL e-mail is sent as text characters. ALL. Not some, not most, but > ALL e-mail is text. No binary content is allowed at all. [ Good explanation, including mention of email not being intended to be a file transfer tool snipped. +1 to all of that ] > > MIME got added to allow the addition of non-ASCII text in messages > (i.e., language support), and to allow e-mail to carry non-text content > as attachments. > > Sending just the URL of an image is polite. The recipient gets to > decide whether to see the online image or not rather than wasting the > bandwidth and disk space (in both sender's and recipient's mailboxes on > their servers and in the clients) to get an e-mail with content they may > not want. Including huge attachments could result in consuming a > recipient's mailbox to its max quota preventing receipt of further > e-mails until the recipient deletes the bloated e-mail. Your focus is primarily on the effects of storage for the receiver, bandwidth, and the effect on the sender's storage are also worth considering. In the days of POP and dial-up connections, the problem was far worse. For POP, if a sender sent a large message, then the effect to the user was a hairball in the mail stream, and where more recent messages could not be downloaded until the large message (often low-priority) was moved. It was in that era when I learned the methodology of making use of a web client for alternate access to a mailbox. If there was a hairball in the inbox, then the thing to do was to go to web access, move (or delete) the offending large message out of the inbox, to allow download of other traffic. This problem seemed to be worst in the years that the world was transitioning from dialup to broadband, and the worst offenders seemed to be the people who had broadband, but not realizing that there were still lots of people that still had dialup. Even with IMAP and broadband, a further effect of emailing large content is that a copy of all that volume gets left in the Sent Mail folder. It's a duplicate copy of content that is already stored locally, and merely takes up storage space on the server. With the perception of unlimited space in Gmail, most people don't really pay attention to quotas, but they are there, and eventually enough attached content may cause issues with a nearly-full mailbox. Although there are places where I will send embedded photos (and where it's appropriate to do so), my preference as receiver is links to content (especially for things like PDF files) with clear descriptions of what is at the other end of the link, that I can choose to follow or not. And for photos, beyond reducing resolution to no larger than 150 dpi), if I'm sending, I frequently go the route of attachment, rather than embedding. For attachments, then Thunderbird's capacities for deleting or detaching become useful, as well. For something that I send, I may need the cover message, but I already have the attachment, and deleting the attachment means that I'm not taking up space with the saved copy, whether in Sent Mail or whatever folder I save to. The other effect that I've found with attachments is that there are far too many people in the world with the bad habit of replying to a message by simply quoting the entire received message, and then inserting a top-quoted reply. If my original has embedded photographs in it, it means that the top-quoted reply has all of my photographs, and even if I want to keep the reply, it means that I have to keep the quotation of my original content, which is the large majority of the message, rather than just the several sentences of reply that I actually want. It is possible to export such a message and edit out the MIME-encoded content, and then import it back, but the process is tedious. I've done it a few times, but infrequently enough that I have to do some trial-and-error to get it to work, and I've never documented it. On the other hand, if I send photos as attachments, then if somebody replies, those attachments aren't included in the response, unless the other person explicitly sets the reply to include them, and people who send top-posted replies normally don't. The result is that if I send photos as attachments, I can delete the attachments from the copies I save, and if a reply comes back with an attachment, I can delete that as well, even if I keep the rest of the message. Smith
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-20 22:00 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-03-20 17:51 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-03-20 17:36 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2025-03-21 06:15 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-03-21 18:52 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2025-03-22 22:22 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-21 12:39 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-03-21 18:57 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-22 15:32 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-22 15:34 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails NFN Smith <worldoff9908@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 17:05 -0700
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-03-21 06:40 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-21 12:41 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-03-21 11:48 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-21 13:59 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.com> - 2025-03-21 09:27 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-21 15:07 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-21 11:31 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-21 17:17 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-21 15:59 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-22 16:43 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-22 16:26 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-22 15:35 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-22 16:40 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-23 19:50 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-24 01:36 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-24 11:50 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-24 18:32 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-21 11:33 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-21 17:24 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-22 16:47 +0000
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-22 13:31 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-22 16:10 -0500
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-22 23:50 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-21 08:17 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-21 15:12 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-21 11:30 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-03-22 15:40 +0100
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-27 14:32 +0200
Re: Pasting photos in html emails knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-27 09:34 -0400
Re: Pasting photos in html emails "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-27 16:07 +0200
csiph-web