Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #17416
| From | sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing |
| Date | 2025-02-22 18:08 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vpdou2$3v20g$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <10kp8l-5u1.ln1@spock.lan> <vpd959$3v20f$2@dont-email.me> <jd0q8l-i42.ln1@spock.lan> <vpdlkd$3v20f$3@dont-email.me> <t43q8l-j22.ln1@spock.lan> |
On 2/22/2025 5:27 PM, dillinger wrote: > On 23/02/2025 00:12, sticks wrote: >> On 2/22/2025 4:41 PM, dillinger wrote: >>> On 22/02/2025 20:39, sticks wrote: >>>> On 2/22/2025 1:09 PM, dillinger wrote: >>>>> On 22/02/2025 13:17, s|b wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:48:06 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 >>>>>>> User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) >>>>>> >>>>>> Flame bait from a Linux fanboy. >>>>>> >>>>> Please don't remove cola, there are people here smart enough to >>>>> filter on it. >>>> >>>> I'm of the opposite opinion. I like when people remove it. >>>> I've filtered anything out that contains COLA as a newsgroup and so >>>> if there are legitimate windows 11 responses I will not see them if >>>> they have that group attached. It just got to be too much nonsense >>>> for me, though I'm sure I am missing things I otherwise would like >>>> to have read. >>>> >>>> So maybe I am missing something in your reply you'd like to expand >>>> upon? How is it that you think filters in this case make things >>>> work better? >>>> >>> COLA is 99% crap, whatever useful lost there is collateral damage. >>> Besides, s|b biting the "Flame bait from a Linux fanboy" is hardly >>> useful, is it? >> >> OK, now I'm really confused. Why did you say "don't" remove it then? >> > s|b removed COLA from the list of groups he's posted his answer. > That evades my filter, and yours, probably, I'm a bit unclear about you, > but I don't like that. OK, I see what you mean at least. I don't think it evaded my filter as it worked exactly as it was supposed to. I think you should add a rule to ignore threads from anything including COLA in newsgroups filed if this is the result you want. I do want to hear what some of the knowledgeable people who usually post in this group write. Just not the noisy ones who's only reason for being here is to advocate for linux and bash MS. Either way, when people post something, it should be their choice what groups they want to include and it is up to the reader to figure out how to deal with from there properly. -- Better Days Ahead! Darwinism Is Junk Science!!
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-21 21:48 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-02-21 17:34 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-21 23:44 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 21:21 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-21 21:29 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 22:00 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-02-26 16:30 +1100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 11:40 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-22 03:03 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-21 22:09 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-22 03:59 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> - 2025-02-22 20:35 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-22 15:38 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-22 03:50 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-22 09:07 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-02-26 16:37 +1100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-26 08:47 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-26 19:26 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-26 17:01 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-27 02:05 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-02-22 20:00 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-22 15:58 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-22 15:55 -0600
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 22:02 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-22 05:46 -0600
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 11:33 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 15:58 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-22 21:22 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-22 21:30 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 16:46 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-23 13:31 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-02-23 08:50 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-23 14:19 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-23 15:01 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-23 10:38 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 14:29 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-23 22:10 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-23 22:25 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-22 16:22 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-02-22 21:48 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-23 05:08 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-02-22 13:17 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2025-02-22 20:09 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-02-22 13:39 -0600
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2025-02-22 23:41 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-02-22 17:12 -0600
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2025-02-23 00:27 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-02-22 18:08 -0600
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-23 11:06 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-02-23 10:50 +0100
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-06 21:57 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-04-06 21:29 -0400
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-09 00:10 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-08 20:59 -0400
csiph-web