Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2872003
| From | super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.mobile.android, rec.autos.driving, talk.politics.guns, misc.phone.mobile.iphone |
| Subject | Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year |
| Date | 2024-12-11 17:17 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vjd6hm$1p3is$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vjch8i$4gn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vjcpo0$1miu2$1@dont-email.me> <vjcu2l$18ii$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 2024-12-11 20:52:37 +0000, Andrew said: > super70s wrote on Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:38:40 -0600 : > >>> And for all the morons out there who love to claim "absence of evidence is >>> not evidence of absence", then simply show evidence of these accidents that >>> you religiously feel must exist simply because you want them to exist. >> >> I saw in my hometown paper yesterday the sister of an erstwhile friend >> crashed her Mercedes into two other cars at a stoplight, causing a >> chain reaction and sending herself and others to the hospital. I'm >> willing to bet she was on the phone. > > > I fully agree with you that there should be a law against using Mercedes > vehicles while driving. It makes perfect sense to do that (in your world). ? You make no sense. Or if that was an attempt at wit you failed. >> Anecdotal but I've seen enough anecdotes to believe these laws are needed. > > Nobody said that driving doesn't *already* include handling a zillion > distractions, so we all agree that only people who are too stupid to handle > those distractions should be driving. > That's why we have a "driving test" for all drivers after all. > > If they're too stupid to handle one more distraction out of hundreds (maybe > thousands) then they shouldn't be driving a vehicle, Mercedes or otherwise. > > In reality, there should be a law against giving stupid people a license. > > In fact, insurance companies always gave me a "good driver" discount and a > "good student" discount because I'm not too stupid to handle distractions. I only have a 10% "claim free" discount. I've been driving for over 50 years without being involved in any kind of accident for almost that long. My latest premium was $271 for 12 months and that's probably a lot cheaper than most are paying (bundled with the house though). Oh yeah, I don't own a cellphone and if I did I'd turn it off when on the road. > If someone has NOT always received both those discounts their entire > driving life, then they are (by definition) too stupid to be in this > conversation. > > Moving forward, please append the sig with whether or not you have a good > driver discount and (when you were going to school) a good student one.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year David Yurman <spamming@your.tv> - 2024-12-11 07:51 +0100
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-11 17:13 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:38 -0600
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-11 20:52 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-12-11 16:11 -0500
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 04:11 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-12-12 07:28 -0500
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 21:14 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-12 09:09 -0600
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-12-12 12:05 -0500
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-12 11:09 -0600
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 21:14 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-13 11:00 -0600
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-13 18:34 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 17:27 -0800
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year MGMT 1B <mgmt1b@ucl.a> - 2024-12-18 01:59 -0800
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Rudy Canoza <r�.@hendrie.con> - 2024-12-18 08:08 -0800
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2024-12-11 17:17 -0600
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 04:09 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 20:11 -0800
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 05:38 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 21:59 -0800
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 11:46 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Andrew <andys@nospam.com> - 2024-12-12 21:14 +0000
Re: Colorado hands-free driving law taking effect in the new year Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 22:00 +0000
csiph-web