Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14346
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne |
| Date | 2024-12-05 11:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <virv4c$eoih$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
Hi, Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne. He is making me paranoid. Especially this F.U.D. here stole one week of my life. Precise Garbage Collection in Prolog https://www.swi-prolog.org/download/publications/lifegc.pdf The test cases make no sense at all! Take this test case run1, similar to run2 and run3: run1 :- f(_). f([f|X]) :- f(X). You will never find this in real world. Perpetual processes usually have a different pattern of loop state transition. Also its virtually impossible to garbage collect via minor incremental garbage collection. We might find a chain X=[f,..,f,Y] and collect it. But Xn is then colored as old. And instantiation of an old variable gets on the changed list, and so a new chain Y=[f,..,f,Z] will not be reclaimed, so that the beast can be only reclaimed via major garbage collection. Bye P.S.: Maybe there is a chance to solve it nevertheless via minor garbage collection, but its very difficult. I had something in formerly Jekejeke Prolog via reference counting. But not sure how to bring it to a Prolog system without reference counting.
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:26 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:33 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:41 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:44 +0100
Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud (Was: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 09:46 +0200
variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2 (Was: Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 09:57 +0200
My stupid Dogelog Player falls back to _<number> (Was: variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 10:18 +0200
the desease of C code overkill (Was: variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-28 16:12 +0200
Quintus Folks were not hating Prolog that much (Was: the desease of C code overkill) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-28 16:32 +0200
Ciao Prolog inspired Test Case (Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-27 07:45 +0200
csiph-web