Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14519
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2 (Was: Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud) |
| Date | 2025-05-25 09:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <100uigj$aeol$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <virv4c$eoih$1@solani.org> <virvig$raf2$1@solani.org> <vis014$raku$1@solani.org> <vis06a$rapp$1@solani.org> <100uhte$8rfn$1@solani.org> |
Hi,
People from Vienna were always a little strange.
Why not adopt term_singletons/2 its already around
for a while. You can do quite some magic with it.
Example: Determining singletons during listing,
from Dogelog Player library(tester/tools):
% sys_listing_write(+Term, +Stream)
sys_listing_write(C, T) :-
term_variables(C, V),
term_singletons(C, A),
sys_listing_names(V, A, 0, N),
write_term(T, C, [quoted(true), variable_names(N), format(true)]),
sys_answer_period(T).
If term_singletons/2 has the same variable ordering
guarantees, i.e. left to right, as in term_variables/2
you can use an algorithm without expensive lookup,
sys_listing_names([], _, _, []).
sys_listing_names([X|L], [Y|R], K, ['_'=X|S]) :- X==Y, !,
sys_listing_names(L, R, K, S).
sys_listing_names([X|L], A, K, [N=X|R]) :-
sys_listing_name(K, N),
J is K+1,
sys_listing_names(L, A, J, R).
Just run along the two lists , if something is both in
the term_variables/2 and term_singletons/2 list, generate
a '_' name, otherwise generate a synthetic name.
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> The development of Trealla Prolog and Scryer Prolog
> looks like a random search in a mental ocean.
>
> It is like Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud,
> you have only to dig deep enough, and a solution
>
> will pop up. Otherwise blame your mother or other
> relatives that raised you for supression.
>
> LoL
>
> Bye
>
> Examples: Still clueless how to detect singletons?
> https://github.com/trealla-prolog/trealla/issues/743
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:26 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:33 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:41 +0100
Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-05 11:44 +0100
Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud (Was: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 09:46 +0200
variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2 (Was: Prolog Development à la Sigmund Freud) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 09:57 +0200
My stupid Dogelog Player falls back to _<number> (Was: variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-25 10:18 +0200
the desease of C code overkill (Was: variable ordering guarantees in term_singletons/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-28 16:12 +0200
Quintus Folks were not hating Prolog that much (Was: the desease of C code overkill) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-28 16:32 +0200
Ciao Prolog inspired Test Case (Re: Ulrich Neumerkel is like Ozzy Osbourne) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-05-27 07:45 +0200
csiph-web