Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #679018
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Two points |
| Date | 2024-12-04 23:13 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vir99h$1cuot$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <vilmbd$3ibs4$2@dont-email.me> <vilps3$3mmr2$3@dont-email.me> <vim3j8$3rvfr$1@dont-email.me> <vim7mg$3t1l3$2@dont-email.me> <vin08k$2jss$1@dont-email.me> |
On 12/3/2024 8:15 AM, -hh wrote: > On 12/3/24 1:15 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 00:05:44 -0500, -hh wrote: >> >>> On 12/2/24 9:19 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:19:41 -0500, -hh wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... I can recall doing some 3D FEA work back in 2002 and the best PC >>>>> workstations we could get would hit the wall & crash at 4 days. >>>> >>>> Running what OS? Sounds like Windows rather than Linux or some other >>>> *nix. >>> >>> TBH, I don't really remember many details anymore ... >> >> Funny, that. Given the era, I’m going to conclude that “I don’t remember” >> means “Microsoft Windows”. > > No, we had Linux in the office, so I can't be definitive. > > Recall what I said: the 'stolen' workstations came with people. I was > happy to get more bodies and be able to delegate the ankle-biter stuff, > rather than to have to add it to my already full plate. There's only so > long that one can work 100 hours/week before it takes a toll/ER visit. Not a chance. I never buy it when people claim they work 80+ hours per week. 100 hours? Pure bullshit. That's 16 hours a day, 6 days a week, plus another half-day. Even a 60-hour workweek is a lot: 10-12 hours per day 5-6 days a week.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two points vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-29 14:52 +0000
Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-29 11:00 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-29 21:54 +0000
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-01 14:29 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 00:43 +0000
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-01 21:47 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 05:44 +0000
Re: Two points rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 06:14 +0000
Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 01:47 -0500
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 08:01 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:25 +0000
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 02:19 +0000
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 00:05 -0500
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 06:15 +0000
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 08:15 -0500
Re: Two points DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-04 23:13 -0500
Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-05 11:25 -0500
Re: Two points candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-03 03:50 +0000
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 04:54 +0000
Re: Two points DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-03 09:23 -0500
Re: Two points candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-03 22:10 +0000
Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 01:31 -0500
Re: Two points vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-02 07:09 +0000
Re: Two points rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 19:03 +0000
Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:25 +0000
csiph-web