Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #678804

Re: Two points

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Two points
Date 2024-12-02 06:14 +0000
Message-ID <lr51htFfehkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <vidd61$18mjb$5@dont-email.me> <viidfc$2ntnt$1@dont-email.me> <viivs8$2t3h9$2@dont-email.me> <vij74v$2trqh$1@dont-email.me> <vijhg6$34qql$3@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 05:44:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> I’m sure the market likes them a lot, but the market cannot change the
> laws of physics either: I can always do more with the resources of a
> desktop than I can with an equivalently-specced laptop, if I don’t need
> the mobility of the latter.

Doesn't 'equivalently-specced' imply the same 'resources'?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two points vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-29 14:52 +0000
  Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-29 11:00 -0500
  Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-29 21:54 +0000
    Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-01 14:29 -0500
      Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 00:43 +0000
        Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-01 21:47 -0500
          Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 05:44 +0000
            Re: Two points rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 06:14 +0000
              Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 01:47 -0500
            Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 08:01 -0500
              Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:25 +0000
                Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 20:19 -0500
                Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 02:19 +0000
                Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 00:05 -0500
                Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 06:15 +0000
                Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 08:15 -0500
                Re: Two points DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-04 23:13 -0500
                Re: Two points -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-05 11:25 -0500
                Re: Two points candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-03 03:50 +0000
                Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 04:54 +0000
                Re: Two points DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-03 09:23 -0500
                Re: Two points candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-03 22:10 +0000
        Re: Two points Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 01:31 -0500
    Re: Two points vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-02 07:09 +0000
      Re: Two points rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 19:03 +0000
      Re: Two points Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:25 +0000

csiph-web