Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14299
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) |
| Date | 2024-11-15 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vh7uo9$7mvn$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <vfj2nk$1e8pq$1@solani.org> <vh6auj$6mca$1@solani.org> <vh7qf9$7ghd$2@solani.org> <vh7r6q$7gs4$3@solani.org> <vh7rr8$7hj8$2@solani.org> |
Or just give up Q&A sites all together. They live in a bubble that they sit on a treasure. Any clue why? Simply because text will pretty soon not be mandatory anymore for training of Chat bots: Early 2000s: Automatic transcription services were rudimentary, relying on basic speech recognition software with limited accuracy. 2010s: The technology began to improve significantly with the development of deep learning and neural networks. Platforms like YouTube introduced automatic captions in 2006, but they were often unreliable and required manual corrections. 2016–2018: Major tech companies, including Google and Microsoft, launched more advanced speech-to-text services. These platforms utilized machine learning algorithms and large datasets to provide more accurate transcriptions. 2020–2023: With advancements in AI and natural language processing (NLP), transcription services became much more accurate and widely available. Companies like Rev, Otter.ai, and others began offering services with high accuracy and specialized features (such as speaker identification, real-time transcription, and more). But ChatGPT isn't there yet? Although ChatGPT itself is not directly trained on video data, multimodal models (such as GPT-4's ability to process images) are paving the way for broader applications of video-based learning in AI. So the cottage industry of training videos will be the next target of knowledge harvesting? Directly incorporating your professors lectures? LoL Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Also Stack Overflow is very bad in reading > the signs of the times: > > Generative AI is now integral to the > technologist workflow, yet many developers > are still skeptical. According to our 2024 > #Developer Survey, 79% of respondents cited > misinformation as their primary ethical > concern regarding AI. > https://x.com/stackoverflow/ > > The survey is not so bad: > https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2024/ai > > So they have it right in front of their > nose that they should shut down > > their grammar nazi nonsense and find > new ways, alternative ways to harness > > and curate knowlegde? > > Bye > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> I personally like that ChatGPT tolerates all my >> sloppiness, since I am always in a hurry, don't >> have time for some bullshit. >> >> And I pay the bill by myself, if ChatGPT doesn't >> understand me. I don't need some moderator to >> force some ideal into my throat, anyway >> >> most of the time ChatGPT understands me >> nevertheless. Has probably to do how >> the artificial intelligenc of ChatGPT works: >> >> Attention Is All You Need >> https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 >> >> But stack overflow gets also drained by other >> developments like for example: >> >> - Thousends of tutorial web sites: >> There is a real cottage industry, of >> commercial web sites, that explain you >> web programming etc.. They are commercial >> since they show banner ads. >> >> - Thousends of tutorial videos: >> There is a similar cottage industry >> for videos. Also commercial because >> the show ads. Even google search >> doesn't show stack overflow as first >> result anymore. >> >> - Declining Business Model Job Search >> With "low code", the number of programmer >> jobs as we know it will go down. A website >> specialized on job advertising will automatically >> loose revenue: >> >> https://stackoverflow.co/advertising/ >> >> Bye >> >> Mild Shock schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Yes exactly, they shoot themselves into the foot. >>> They adopted the academic closed world attitute, >>> as can be seen here, not noticing that the John >>> >>> Doe programmers are not necessarily a theoretical >>> computer science titanic A-class member: >>> >>> As an example, consider this question – invented, but not far-fetched: >>> "Random keeps giving me the same numbers. Is it broken?" >>> This is a low-quality question, in my view. >>> https://codeblog.jonskeet.uk/2018/03/17/stack-overflow-culture/ >>> >>> Now try the same with ChatGPT: >>> >>> Q: Random keeps giving me the same numbers. Is it broken? >>> >>> A: It sounds like your Random object might not be >>> re-seeded, which could cause it to generate the same >>> sequence of numbers every time you run your program. >>> By default, Random is seeded with the current time in >>> milliseconds, but if you create it multiple times in >>> quick succession, it might receive the same seed and >>> generate the same numbers. >>> >>> Bye >>> >>> Mild Shock schrieb: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The cest pool of bit rot is finally gone: >>>> >>>> (Bit rot, because they did everything in a >>>> facist way ignoring your copyright to prevent >>>> you from deleting you own out dated stuff) >>>> >>>> CoincidenceIDontThinkSo >>>> https://9gag.com/gag/abAG4oE >>>> >>>> The Fall of Stack Overflow >>>> https://observablehq.com/@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow >>>> >>>> The downfall is related to the appearance of >>>> ChatGPT. I feel pitty for Ulrich Neumerkel false >>>> and others who spammed stackoverflow for years >>>> >>>> with their infinite dif/2 nonsense. >>>> >>>> Bye >> >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-27 19:58 +0200
Re: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-27 20:01 +0200
Scryer Prolog is dead now? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-20 11:35 +0200
What about the Holy Grail? (Was: Scryer Prolog is dead now?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-21 17:29 +0200
Is Rust the culprit? (Was: What about the Holy Grail?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:16 +0200
Re: Is Rust the culprit? (Was: What about the Holy Grail?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:26 +0200
Re: Is Rust the culprit? (Was: What about the Holy Grail?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:38 +0200
Night Train to Lisbon (Re: Is Rust the culprit?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-18 01:35 +0200
Prolog System running on JS/Bun ? (Was: Night Train to Lisbon) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-20 14:20 +0100
Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment (Was: Is Rust the culprit?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-26 17:43 +0200
Good Bye Stack-Overflow (Was: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 03:16 +0100
Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow (Was: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 03:24 +0100
Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow (Was: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 03:28 +0100
Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow (Was: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 03:54 +0100
they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 16:47 +0100
Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 17:00 +0100
Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 17:11 +0100
Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-15 18:00 +0100
Can we trust the Scryer Prolog Gurus? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 00:27 +0200
Re: Can we trust the Scryer Prolog Gurus? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 00:30 +0200
Re: Can we trust the Scryer Prolog Gurus? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 00:42 +0200
The longest pregnancy in the history of Prolog ~~> DCGs (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 09:51 +0200
Re: The longest pregnancy in the history of Prolog ~~> DCGs (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 09:52 +0200
Re: The longest pregnancy in the history of Prolog ~~> DCGs (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 10:18 +0200
Re: The longest pregnancy in the history of Prolog ~~> DCGs (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 10:20 +0200
Re: The longest pregnancy in the history of Prolog ~~> DCGs (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 16:38 +0200
Is Scryer Prolog the Air Guitar of Prolog? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 21:56 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prolog the Air Guitar of Prolog? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 23:49 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prolog the Air Guitar of Prolog? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now…) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 22:21 +0200
Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-26 15:38 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-26 15:41 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 11:27 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 11:36 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 11:52 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 11:56 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 12:04 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 12:09 +0200
Re: Did Lifeware Kill Scryer Prolog CLP(Z) ? (Was: A harsh wind is blowing into the face of Prolog now… [FORTRAN / TIOBE Index for May 2024]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-27 12:54 +0200
csiph-web