Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2827715
| From | super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.green.party, alt.politics.elections, wi.general, talk.politics.guns |
| Subject | Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge |
| Date | 2024-08-30 17:33 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vathbn$lv7s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lnsB1DE8F5F517866F089P2473@0.0.0.1> <vatflh$lmer$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 2024-08-30 22:04:32 +0000, Mittens Romney said: > Leroy N. Soetoro wrote: >> https://apnews.com/article/jill-stein-wisconsin-president-ballot-2024- >> e8cb52080dc7ba32997642e962dc0b06 >> >> MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein will >> remain on the ballot in the crucial swing state of Wisconsin after the >> state Supreme Court decided on Monday not to hear a Democratic challenge >> seeking to oust her. >> >> Democrats are concerned that third-party candidates could draw votes away >> from Vice President Kamala Harris and help Republican Donald Trump win >> Wisconsin. The presence of independent and third party candidates on the >> ballot could be a deciding factor in a state where four of the last six >> presidential elections have been decided by between 5,700 votes and about >> 23,000 votes. >> >> The court decided against hearing the challenge brought by David Strange, >> an employee of the Democratic National Committee, who sought to oust Stein >> from the ballot. The court did not explain its reasoning. >> >> “We determine that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief he seeks,” >> the court said in its unsigned order. >> >> Strange argued that the Green Party can’t nominate presidential electors >> in Wisconsin because the party does not have any state officeholders or >> legislative candidates authorized to nominate presidential electors. >> >> The Green Party and Republicans countered that the party met all of its >> legal requirements and that Stein should be allowed to remain on the >> ballot. >> >> Stein praised the decision, saying the Green Party “beat back the DNC’s >> attack.” >> >> “Today justice prevailed,” she said in a statement. >> >> Michael White, co-chair of the Wisconsin Green Party, called the complaint >> a “mark of fear by the Democratic Party” and said the attention generated >> by it had motivated Stein backers. >> >> “It was an inevitable conclusion because the complaint had no merit to >> begin with and we knew that,” he said. >> >> Democratic National Committee spokesperson Adrienne Watson called the >> decision “disappointing” and said the Green Party should not be on the >> ballot. >> >> Stein last appeared on the Wisconsin ballot 2016, when she won just over >> 31,000 votes — more than Trump’s winning margin of just under 23,000 >> votes. Some Democrats have blamed her for helping Trump win the state and >> the presidency that year. >> >> Strange had challenged a Wisconsin Elections Commission decision in >> February to grant the Green Party ballot access. The commission did so >> because a candidate from the party won more than 1% of the vote in a >> statewide race in 2022, meeting a requirement under the law. Sheryl >> McFarland got nearly 1.6% of the vote while finishing last in a four-way >> race for secretary of state. >> >> The Wisconsin Elections Commission is scheduled to meet Tuesday to certify >> which candidates can appear on the ballot. Democrats are also challenging >> the placement of independent candidate Cornel West on the ballot. A >> Republican National Committee employee is challenging independent Shiva >> Ayyadurai’s candidacy. >> >> The Wisconsin Supreme Court kept Green Party presidential candidate Howie >> Hawkins off the ballot in 2020 after the elections commission deadlocked >> on whether he filed proper nominating signatures. >> >> > Joke is on them I believe, she will draw only commies/dems. Last time fascists/repugs helped put Kanye on the ballot and they still lost the state.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-insurrection@mail.house.gov> - 2024-08-30 21:05 +0000
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> - 2024-08-30 16:04 -0600
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-30 18:25 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2024-08-30 17:33 -0500
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-31 21:02 +0000
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-09-01 03:53 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2024-09-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Lil dwarf Rudey <dumbasastump@invalid.org> - 2024-09-01 12:10 -0600
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-30 18:22 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-08-31 00:11 -0400
csiph-web