Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.politics.green.party > #2342
| From | Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.green.party, alt.politics.elections, wi.general, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics |
| Subject | Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge |
| Date | 2024-08-30 16:04 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vatflh$lmer$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lnsB1DE8F5F517866F089P2473@0.0.0.1> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
Leroy N. Soetoro wrote: > https://apnews.com/article/jill-stein-wisconsin-president-ballot-2024- > e8cb52080dc7ba32997642e962dc0b06 > > MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein will > remain on the ballot in the crucial swing state of Wisconsin after the > state Supreme Court decided on Monday not to hear a Democratic challenge > seeking to oust her. > > Democrats are concerned that third-party candidates could draw votes away > from Vice President Kamala Harris and help Republican Donald Trump win > Wisconsin. The presence of independent and third party candidates on the > ballot could be a deciding factor in a state where four of the last six > presidential elections have been decided by between 5,700 votes and about > 23,000 votes. > > The court decided against hearing the challenge brought by David Strange, > an employee of the Democratic National Committee, who sought to oust Stein > from the ballot. The court did not explain its reasoning. > > “We determine that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief he seeks,” > the court said in its unsigned order. > > Strange argued that the Green Party can’t nominate presidential electors > in Wisconsin because the party does not have any state officeholders or > legislative candidates authorized to nominate presidential electors. > > The Green Party and Republicans countered that the party met all of its > legal requirements and that Stein should be allowed to remain on the > ballot. > > Stein praised the decision, saying the Green Party “beat back the DNC’s > attack.” > > “Today justice prevailed,” she said in a statement. > > Michael White, co-chair of the Wisconsin Green Party, called the complaint > a “mark of fear by the Democratic Party” and said the attention generated > by it had motivated Stein backers. > > “It was an inevitable conclusion because the complaint had no merit to > begin with and we knew that,” he said. > > Democratic National Committee spokesperson Adrienne Watson called the > decision “disappointing” and said the Green Party should not be on the > ballot. > > Stein last appeared on the Wisconsin ballot 2016, when she won just over > 31,000 votes — more than Trump’s winning margin of just under 23,000 > votes. Some Democrats have blamed her for helping Trump win the state and > the presidency that year. > > Strange had challenged a Wisconsin Elections Commission decision in > February to grant the Green Party ballot access. The commission did so > because a candidate from the party won more than 1% of the vote in a > statewide race in 2022, meeting a requirement under the law. Sheryl > McFarland got nearly 1.6% of the vote while finishing last in a four-way > race for secretary of state. > > The Wisconsin Elections Commission is scheduled to meet Tuesday to certify > which candidates can appear on the ballot. Democrats are also challenging > the placement of independent candidate Cornel West on the ballot. A > Republican National Committee employee is challenging independent Shiva > Ayyadurai’s candidacy. > > The Wisconsin Supreme Court kept Green Party presidential candidate Howie > Hawkins off the ballot in 2020 after the elections commission deadlocked > on whether he filed proper nominating signatures. > > Joke is on them I believe, she will draw only commies/dems. -- ⛨ 🥐🥖🗼
Back to alt.politics.green.party | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-insurrection@mail.house.gov> - 2024-08-30 21:05 +0000
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> - 2024-08-30 16:04 -0600
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-30 18:25 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2024-08-30 17:33 -0500
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-31 21:02 +0000
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-09-01 03:53 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2024-09-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Lil dwarf Rudey <dumbasastump@invalid.org> - 2024-09-01 12:10 -0600
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-30 18:22 -0400
Re: Green Party's Jill Stein will remain on Wisconsin ballot after court refuses to hear challenge Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2024-08-31 00:11 -0400
csiph-web