Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14144
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) |
| Date | 2024-08-10 13:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v97j54$11n9o$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <v97f6r$11l7k$1@solani.org> <v97h77$11m5e$1@solani.org> <v97het$11mct$1@solani.org> <v97i30$11mn6$1@solani.org> <v97icn$11mpq$1@solani.org> |
Hi, Generally I don't believe in things like SWI-Prolog Janus Python integration. This type of integration has the advantage that SWI-Prolog can run in full speed, on the other hand it has the disadvantage that one cannot take advantage of Python async, because SWI-Prolog itself has no async. I am talking about the single threaded async here. My experience single treaded async and multi-threaded Prolog are quite different pairs of shoes. So when doing the C# backend for Dogelog Player, I will be faced again to provide a complete async solution for the async part of Novacore. Woa! Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > A few days age we improved the cross referencer, > to deal with the many target platforms. The > old cross referencer for example showed: > > xor/3 nova/Eval.java > nova/eval.mjs > nova/eval.py > > Meaning the evaluable function xor/3 is > available in Java, JavaScript and Python. > What we now do, we simply show: > > xor/3 nova/eval.* > > Soon the wildcard will mean C# as well, > and not only Java, JavaScript and Python. > Extending the proof of concept for Prolog > > compiler 100% written in Prolog itself. > > Bye
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:13 +0200
Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:20 +0200
ZebralLogic for evaluating LLMs (Was: Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:24 +0200
Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 19:21 +0200
Biene Maya (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 22:26 +0200
A Challenge for Fixpoint Lovers (Was: Biene Maya) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-02 08:03 +0200
Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-09 14:42 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 12:25 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 12:59 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:03 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:14 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:19 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:32 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:41 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:46 +0200
The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:03 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:05 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:19 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 14:03 +0200
How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 15:48 +0200
Re: How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 15:49 +0200
Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 09:08 +0200
csiph-web