Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14142
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) |
| Date | 2024-08-10 13:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v97i30$11mn6$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <v8gc6e$l44p$1@solani.org> <v952rb$10h3e$1@solani.org> <v97f6r$11l7k$1@solani.org> <v97h77$11m5e$1@solani.org> <v97het$11mct$1@solani.org> |
Hi, The C# backend was already planned 3 years ago. But then we gave priority to a Python backend. But Python is the worst language on this planet. Their module approach doesn't really have export modifiers. Nevertheless they top TIOBE: Highest Position (since 2001): #1 in Aug 2024 https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/python/ Superficially even Prolog has a better module system, although export restrictions are not enforced, you can pretend to do exports, via the module/2 directive. After we completed the Python backend, we recently did the Java backend. But this was not only done for the benefit of Java, but also as an intermediate step for the C# backend. We are pretty close to that everything has stabilized, and it would be a good timing to do the C# backend then. Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Currently I wish to add a C# sharp backend, > and also show some Unity integration. > > But I am facing some health problems, some > nasty virus infection, which still persists > > a little bit. Either I will be able to do > it in 2024, or you wont here anything > > from me anymore... > > LoL > > Bye
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:13 +0200
Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:20 +0200
ZebralLogic for evaluating LLMs (Was: Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 18:24 +0200
Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 19:21 +0200
Biene Maya (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-01 22:26 +0200
A Challenge for Fixpoint Lovers (Was: Biene Maya) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-02 08:03 +0200
Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-09 14:42 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 12:25 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 12:59 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:03 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:14 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:19 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:32 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:41 +0200
Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 13:46 +0200
The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:03 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:05 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 11:19 +0200
Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 14:03 +0200
How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 15:48 +0200
Re: How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 15:49 +0200
Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 09:08 +0200
csiph-web