Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #107886
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure |
| Date | 2024-06-26 19:24 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v5ibfc$2cko8$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (29 earlier) <v5gs85$15l89$1@i2pn2.org> <v5h5c4$24jbd$9@dont-email.me> <v5i8vg$17ej1$3@i2pn2.org> <v5i9fh$2cko8$2@dont-email.me> <v5i9j2$17ej0$2@i2pn2.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/26/24 7:50 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/26/2024 6:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 6/26/24 9:33 AM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 6/26/2024 5:58 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 6/25/24 11:37 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 6/25/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/25/24 11:25 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 9:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 10:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 9:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 9:59 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 8:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 9:02 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 6:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 11:13 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 10:38 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 10:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 9:55 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You still haven't shown where I lied, on where you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't like what I say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that D correctly simulated by H must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have the behavior of the directly executed D(D). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right, the steps that H sees are IDENTIAL to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps of the directly executed D(D) until H stops >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its simulation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT ONE DIFFERENCE. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Honest mistake or liar? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The directly executed D(D) has identical behavior to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not the same behavior as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what instruction did H's simulation differ from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the direct executions trace? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which isn't "Behavior of the input" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "not happening" of something that could have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened except that the processing was stoped is NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H1 --- Identical to D(D) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right, and it contains ALL of the behavior of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct simulation of D by H, plus more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H doesn't see DIFFERENT behavior, just LESS, and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differnce isn't due to the input, but due to H. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *These are not the same behaviors* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Assuming unlimited memory) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When 1 to a googolplex of steps of D are correctly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) NEVER RETURNS* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correction, 1 to a googleplex of steps if DIFFERENT Ds, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each paired with a DIFFERENT H, when simulated by that H, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the DIFFFERENT routines called by those DIFFERENT Ds to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that DIFFERENT H(D,D) is never simulated to an end. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _P() >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e5] 51 push ecx ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e9] 50 push eax ; push parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ea] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ed] 51 push ecx ; push parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ee] e82ff3ffff call 00001422 ; call H(P,P) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f3] 83c408 add esp,+08 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f6] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f9] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020fd] 7402 jz 00002101 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ff] ebfe jmp 000020ff >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002101] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002104] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002106] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002107] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is correctly simulated by any H that can possibly exist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless you say yes you are correct we cannot move on to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next point. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, the call most definitinely DOES return, but that return >>>>>>>>>>>>> is after the simulation ended. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the real problem is that you have insufficient >>>>>>>>>>>> technical competence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, that isn't the problem. I KNOW what I am talking about, >>>>>>>>>>> as opposed to you who can't even write a simple Turing Machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your problem is that, strictly, by your definition of >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Correct Simulation", >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The semantics of the x86 language objectively proves that I >>>>>>>>>>>> am correct. >>>>>>>>>>>> Have you been faking your technical competence? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you do better with this simpler example? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) >>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated >>>>>>>>>>>> by H0 cannot possibly return. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But the call will, just not in the simulation that your H0 does. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK so we are back to you being a freaking liar trying to get >>>>>>>>>> away with contradicting the semantics of the x86 language. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How does that contradictthe semantics of the x86 languge? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If H0 is a decider, it will ALWAYS return an answer in finite time >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> H0 is not even a decider yet. When you leap ahead you >>>>>>>> diverge from the point at hand. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> THen it is allowed to be the impure function , so you r claim is >>>>>>> proven false. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We have not even gotten that far yet. >>>>>> We ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT the behavior of DDD correctly >>>>>> simulated by H0. AKA software engineering and NOT computer >>>>>> science. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, you have no grounds to exclude my version of H0, so your claim >>>>> is just proven false. >>>>> >>>> >>>> As soon as you quit lying we can move on to the next point. >>>> >>> >>> BUt YOU ARE the one that is caught in the lie. >>> >> >> You know that using static local variable to change the behavior >> is cheating so now you are a liar and a cheater. >> > > Where is the rule it broke? > > You didn't state it, and said that this was a total fresh thread as we > couldn't use the fact that you are going to call H0 a Halt Decider. Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating. Others here will be baffled and confused. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:40 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? (typo corrected) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 09:00 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 14:20 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 16:41 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 17:49 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 17:04 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 18:35 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 17:45 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 18:58 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 18:34 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 19:44 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 19:08 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 20:24 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:00 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 21:13 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:20 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 21:30 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:36 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:00 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:09 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:16 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:27 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:31 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:52 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 23:11 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 22:26 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 07:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:39 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:17 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 18:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:57 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:42 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:19 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 18:43 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:59 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 19:02 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 20:06 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 19:34 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 20:54 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:05 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:13 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:22 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:24 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:07 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:22 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:32 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:51 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:55 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:17 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:25 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:26 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:48 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:52 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 06:59 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 22:13 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 07:04 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 08:02 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 21:47 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 20:59 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 22:17 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 21:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 22:54 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 22:25 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 23:32 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 22:37 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 06:58 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 08:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:41 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 18:50 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:52 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 19:19 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 20:38 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 19:24 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 20:40 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 20:12 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 21:21 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 21:10 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 22:38 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 21:46 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 23:16 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 22:37 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 07:34 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 08:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 19:57 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 22:25 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-28 07:44 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 07:28 -0500
Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-28 12:58 +0000
Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 09:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-28 23:49 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 23:09 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-25 09:14 +0000
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:03 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:13 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:28 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-24 19:44 +0000
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 15:05 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:19 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 07:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 08:48 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:47 -0400
csiph-web