Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #107888
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure |
| Date | 2024-06-26 20:40 -0400 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <v5icdm$17ej1$7@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | (28 earlier) <v5h5c4$24jbd$9@dont-email.me> <v5i8vg$17ej1$3@i2pn2.org> <v5i9fh$2cko8$2@dont-email.me> <v5i9j2$17ej0$2@i2pn2.org> <v5ibfc$2cko8$5@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 6/26/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 6/26/24 7:50 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/26/2024 6:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 6/26/24 9:33 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/26/2024 5:58 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 6/25/24 11:37 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 11:25 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 9:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 10:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 9:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 9:59 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 8:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/24 9:02 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2024 6:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 11:13 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 10:38 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 10:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 9:55 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You still haven't shown where I lied, on where you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't like what I say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that D correctly simulated by H must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have the behavior of the directly executed D(D). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right, the steps that H sees are IDENTIAL to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps of the directly executed D(D) until H stops >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its simulation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT ONE DIFFERENCE. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Honest mistake or liar? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The directly executed D(D) has identical behavior to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not the same behavior as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what instruction did H's simulation differ from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the direct executions trace? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which isn't "Behavior of the input" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "not happening" of something that could have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened except that the processing was stoped is NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D correctly simulated by H1 --- Identical to D(D) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right, and it contains ALL of the behavior of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct simulation of D by H, plus more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H doesn't see DIFFERENT behavior, just LESS, and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differnce isn't due to the input, but due to H. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *These are not the same behaviors* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Assuming unlimited memory) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When 1 to a googolplex of steps of D are correctly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulated by H >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) NEVER RETURNS* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correction, 1 to a googleplex of steps if DIFFERENT Ds, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each paired with a DIFFERENT H, when simulated by that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H, the DIFFFERENT routines called by those DIFFERENT Ds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that DIFFERENT H(D,D) is never simulated to an end. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _P() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e5] 51 push ecx ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020e9] 50 push eax ; push >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ea] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ed] 51 push ecx ; push >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ee] e82ff3ffff call 00001422 ; call H(P,P) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f3] 83c408 add esp,+08 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f6] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020f9] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020fd] 7402 jz 00002101 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000020ff] ebfe jmp 000020ff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002101] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002104] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002106] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002107] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is correctly simulated by any H that can possibly exist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless you say yes you are correct we cannot move on to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next point. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, the call most definitinely DOES return, but that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> return is after the simulation ended. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the real problem is that you have insufficient >>>>>>>>>>>>> technical competence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, that isn't the problem. I KNOW what I am talking >>>>>>>>>>>> about, as opposed to you who can't even write a simple >>>>>>>>>>>> Turing Machine. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your problem is that, strictly, by your definition of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Correct Simulation", >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The semantics of the x86 language objectively proves that I >>>>>>>>>>>>> am correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you been faking your technical competence? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you do better with this simpler example? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) >>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated >>>>>>>>>>>>> by H0 cannot possibly return. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But the call will, just not in the simulation that your H0 >>>>>>>>>>>> does. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> OK so we are back to you being a freaking liar trying to get >>>>>>>>>>> away with contradicting the semantics of the x86 language. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How does that contradictthe semantics of the x86 languge? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If H0 is a decider, it will ALWAYS return an answer in finite >>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> H0 is not even a decider yet. When you leap ahead you >>>>>>>>> diverge from the point at hand. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> THen it is allowed to be the impure function , so you r claim is >>>>>>>> proven false. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have not even gotten that far yet. >>>>>>> We ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT the behavior of DDD correctly >>>>>>> simulated by H0. AKA software engineering and NOT computer >>>>>>> science. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, you have no grounds to exclude my version of H0, so your claim >>>>>> is just proven false. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As soon as you quit lying we can move on to the next point. >>>>> >>>> >>>> BUt YOU ARE the one that is caught in the lie. >>>> >>> >>> You know that using static local variable to change the behavior >>> is cheating so now you are a liar and a cheater. >>> >> >> Where is the rule it broke? >> >> You didn't state it, and said that this was a total fresh thread as we >> couldn't use the fact that you are going to call H0 a Halt Decider. > > Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating. > Others here will be baffled and confused. > But the rules are the rules, and you can't create rules you didn't state. Remember, if the decider is a pure function, then the emulated call must do the same thing as the direct call, so one can not return and the other not. So, all you are doing is admitting that the ddciders emulation is just incorect (if you claim the emulation shows that) or its logic is incorrect.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:40 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? (typo corrected) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 09:00 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 14:20 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 16:41 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 17:49 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 17:04 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 18:35 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 17:45 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 18:58 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 18:34 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 19:44 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 19:08 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 20:24 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:00 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 21:13 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:20 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 21:30 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:36 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:00 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:09 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:16 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:27 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:31 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:52 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 23:11 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 22:26 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 07:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:39 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:17 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 18:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:57 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:42 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:19 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 18:43 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:59 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 19:02 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 20:06 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 19:34 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 20:54 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:05 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:13 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:22 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:24 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:07 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:22 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:32 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 21:51 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 20:55 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:17 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:25 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:26 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:38 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 22:48 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 21:52 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 06:59 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 22:13 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 07:04 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 08:02 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 21:47 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 20:59 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 22:17 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 21:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 22:54 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 22:25 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 23:32 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 22:37 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 06:58 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 08:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:41 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 18:50 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:52 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 19:19 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 20:38 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 19:24 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 20:40 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 20:12 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 21:21 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 21:10 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 22:38 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 21:46 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 23:16 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 22:37 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 07:34 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 08:21 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 19:57 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 22:25 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-28 07:44 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 07:28 -0500
Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-28 12:58 +0000
Re: Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 09:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-28 23:49 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 23:09 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-25 09:14 +0000
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 20:33 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:03 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 21:13 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 22:28 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-24 19:44 +0000
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 15:05 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:19 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 07:02 -0400
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 08:48 -0500
Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:47 -0400
csiph-web