Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187316
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors |
| Date | 2017-09-27 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uumrE-4VK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uujWO-2Bu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uujWO-2Bu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uulOW-4rv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 27/09/2017 à 16:43, Gene Heskett a écrit : > > Secondary question. On efi setups, how much blank space in front of the > 1st partition is needed for that stuff on a terrabyte drive? None. That space is not used in EFI setups. Instead the bootloaders are in a regular EFI partition.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 14:50 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 16:50 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 17:00 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 17:00 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:20 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-09-28 03:30 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-27 17:30 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
csiph-web