Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #187329

Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors

From Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors
Date 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <uuojM-63X-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uujWO-2Bu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uulOW-4rv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <uumrE-4VK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wednesday 27 September 2017 11:28:53 Pascal Hambourg wrote:

> Le 27/09/2017 à 16:43, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > Secondary question. On efi setups, how much blank space in front of
> > the 1st partition is needed for that stuff on a terrabyte drive?
>
> None.
> That space is not used in EFI setups. Instead the bootloaders are in a
> regular EFI partition.

I see that now on the sdcard this rock64 is booting from. 'nother memo I 
missed. :(

Thanks Pascal.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 14:50 +0200
  Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 16:50 +0200
    Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 17:00 +0200
    Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 17:00 +0200
      Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:20 +0200
        Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-09-28 03:30 +0200
    Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-27 17:30 +0200
      Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200

csiph-web