Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187306
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors |
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uukga-35a-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uujWO-2Bu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 27/09/2017 à 14:42, Gene Heskett a écrit : > > [ 2404.664052] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1953525167 512-byte logical blocks: > (1.00 TB/932 GiB) > [ 2404.676277] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2048-byte physical blocks > > But I've now spent several hours trying to put the 1st of 3 partitions on > it with figures that satisfy parted's align-check, including calculation > of values that result in mod(2048)=0. Nothing seems to satisfy parted. Can you elaborate ? You description is vague, and we cannot see what's on your screen. Don't bother with alignment. Modern partitioners' default alignement is suitable for all drives.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 14:50 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 15:40 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 17:40 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 18:10 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 21:20 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-09-27 18:40 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:40 +0200
Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:40 +0200
csiph-web