Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #187306

Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors

From Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors
Date 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200
Message-ID <uukga-35a-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uujWO-2Bu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Le 27/09/2017 à 14:42, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> 
> [ 2404.664052] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1953525167 512-byte logical blocks:
> (1.00 TB/932 GiB)
> [ 2404.676277] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2048-byte physical blocks
> 
> But I've now spent several hours trying to put the 1st of 3 partitions on
> it with figures that satisfy parted's align-check, including calculation
> of values that result in mod(2048)=0. Nothing seems to satisfy parted.

Can you elaborate ? You description is vague, and we cannot see what's 
on your screen.

Don't bother with alignment. Modern partitioners' default alignement is 
suitable for all drives.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 14:50 +0200
  Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200
    Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 15:40 +0200
    Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 17:40 +0200
      Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 18:10 +0200
        Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
          Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2017-09-27 21:20 +0200
      Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-09-27 18:40 +0200
      Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0200
        Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-09-27 19:40 +0200
  Re: disk partitioners vs disk with 2048 byte phusical sectors Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:40 +0200

csiph-web