Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14002

Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy!

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.prolog
Subject Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy!
Date 2024-03-01 19:45 +0100
Message-ID <urt7ol$qkts$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <urt0n0$qgjc$1@solani.org> <urt0rj$qgjc$2@solani.org> <urt1dd$qh1v$1@solani.org> <urt1tr$qhcg$1@solani.org> <urt22u$qhcg$2@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


A small sanity test. How does formerly Jekejeke Prolog
and Dogelog Player perform. Dogelog Player has not yet
call/N, I do not promote using it, since I am

still waiting for a good idea to compile it a little
bit more statically. Formerly Jekejeke Prolog uses a
dynamic inline cache, polymorphic in the arity.

But this test case is anyway less about call/N and
more about call/1 and is/2. I get:

For formerly Jekejeke Prolog:

/* Jekejeke Prolog 1.6.6 */
?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)).
% Zeit 540 ms, GC 3 ms, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:37
X = (_0 is 1+2, _1 is _0+3).

?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)).
% Zeit 867 ms, GC 3 ms, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:37
true.

For Dogelog Player:

/* Dogelog Player 1.1.6 */
?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)).
% Zeit 447 ms, GC 0 ms, Lips 15660199, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:38
X = (_16030782 is 1+2, _16030783 is _16030782+3).

?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)).
% Zeit 1780 ms, GC 0 ms, Lips 14606802, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:38
true.

Jekejeke Prolog and Dogelog Player do not choke
like Scryer Prolog does. The performance of Dogelog
Player is amazing, since call/1 is implemented in

pure Prolog, not via an interpreter, but via a little
compiler, and an intermediate form, that we anyway use
when we generate cross compiled code or

static/dynamic clausse.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> But I cannot retract my claim about Scryer Prolog
> it definitively chokes:
> 
> ?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)).
>     % CPU time: 2.233s, 11_000_023 inferences
>     X = (_A is 1+2,_B is _A+3).
> 
> ?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)).
>     % CPU time: 6.180s, 13_000_045 inferences
>     true.
> 
> Thats an order slower than Trealla and SWI-Prolog.
> 

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 20:46 +0100
  Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
    Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-02 12:50 -0800
      Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 03:25 -0800
    Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:34 -0800
      Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:39 -0800
        Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:45 -0800
          Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:53 -0800
  Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:29 -0800
    Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:33 -0800
  Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:27 +0100
    Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:28 +0100
      Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:30 +0100
        Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-21 03:43 -0800
  Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:45 +0100
    Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:47 +0100
      Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:57 +0100
        Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:06 +0100
          Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:08 +0100
            Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 19:45 +0100
              Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 21:33 +0100
  Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-06 01:56 +0100

csiph-web