Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14002
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! |
| Date | 2024-03-01 19:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <urt7ol$qkts$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <urt0n0$qgjc$1@solani.org> <urt0rj$qgjc$2@solani.org> <urt1dd$qh1v$1@solani.org> <urt1tr$qhcg$1@solani.org> <urt22u$qhcg$2@solani.org> |
A small sanity test. How does formerly Jekejeke Prolog and Dogelog Player perform. Dogelog Player has not yet call/N, I do not promote using it, since I am still waiting for a good idea to compile it a little bit more statically. Formerly Jekejeke Prolog uses a dynamic inline cache, polymorphic in the arity. But this test case is anyway less about call/N and more about call/1 and is/2. I get: For formerly Jekejeke Prolog: /* Jekejeke Prolog 1.6.6 */ ?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)). % Zeit 540 ms, GC 3 ms, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:37 X = (_0 is 1+2, _1 is _0+3). ?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)). % Zeit 867 ms, GC 3 ms, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:37 true. For Dogelog Player: /* Dogelog Player 1.1.6 */ ?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)). % Zeit 447 ms, GC 0 ms, Lips 15660199, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:38 X = (_16030782 is 1+2, _16030783 is _16030782+3). ?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)). % Zeit 1780 ms, GC 0 ms, Lips 14606802, Uhr 01.03.2024 19:38 true. Jekejeke Prolog and Dogelog Player do not choke like Scryer Prolog does. The performance of Dogelog Player is amazing, since call/1 is implemented in pure Prolog, not via an interpreter, but via a little compiler, and an intermediate form, that we anyway use when we generate cross compiled code or static/dynamic clausse. Mild Shock schrieb: > But I cannot retract my claim about Scryer Prolog > it definitively chokes: > > ?- p(X), time((between(1,1000000,_),X,fail; true)). > % CPU time: 2.233s, 11_000_023 inferences > X = (_A is 1+2,_B is _A+3). > > ?- time((between(1,1000000,_),p(X),X,fail; true)). > % CPU time: 6.180s, 13_000_045 inferences > true. > > Thats an order slower than Trealla and SWI-Prolog. >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 20:46 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-02 12:50 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 03:25 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:34 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:39 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:45 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:53 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:29 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:33 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:27 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:28 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:30 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-21 03:43 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:45 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:47 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:57 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:06 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:08 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 19:45 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 21:33 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-06 01:56 +0100
csiph-web