Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #13982
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! |
| Date | 2024-02-21 01:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ur3g2r$d0vr$2@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <upjgq3$19qjv$1@solani.org> <ur3g0l$d0vr$1@solani.org> |
Its also proof of concept that no stack copying is necessary. Well its not 100% true the Prolog interpreter does a little bit unwind and rewind during the '$YIELD'/1 instruction. But we do nowhere copy some native stack, this is unlike Martin Odersky's speculation, he might implement someting with stack copying. Except that a virtual threads might using a copying when they resize their stack, I don't see any need for copying. Also sometimes a callback can be piggy packed on an existing coroutine if it doesn't yield itself, I am already using this in Dogelog Player as an optimization. The idea to use semaphores in my implementation can be credited to this paper from 1980 where semaphores are the main switchpoint: Extension of Pascal and its Application to Quasi-Parallel Programming and Simulation, Software - Practice and Experience, 10 (1980), 773-789 J. Kriz and H. Sandmayr https://www.academia.edu/47139332 But my experience with JDK 21 virtual threads is still poor, I am only beginning to explore them as a way to have a large number of coroutines. Mild Shock schrieb: > My revecent Async/Await surrogates for JDK 21 > provide coroutines with suspend/resume semantics. > They are not continuations. They aim is to provide > async/await and not only setTimeout(). > > As a result you don't need to write libraries > with a continuation parameters. This is very unlike > nonsense such as the JavaScript express web framework. > > stackfulness > In contrast to a stackless coroutine a stackful > coroutine can be suspended from within a nested > stackframe. Execution resumes at exactly the same > point in the code where it was suspended before. > > stackless > With a stackless coroutine, only the top-level routine > may be suspended. Any routine called by that top-level > routine may not itself suspend. This prohibits > providing suspend/resume operations in routines within > a general-purpose library. > https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_57_0/libs/coroutine/doc/html/coroutine/intro.html#coroutine.intro.stackfulness > > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Just watched 2 videos from Scala and the >> year 2023 and nearly chocked on my yoghurt, >> >> especially when I saw the first presenter got a >> headeache from early returns. LoL >> >> Async/Await for the Monadic Programmer >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH5cxLNTTPo >> >> DIRECT STYLE SCALA Scalar Conference 2023 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fm0y4K4YO8 >> >> Whats the bottom line: All because they discovered they >> could do async/await as well? >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 20:46 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-02 12:50 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 03:25 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:34 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-11 14:39 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:45 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 06:53 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:29 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 13:33 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:27 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:28 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-21 01:30 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2024-02-21 03:43 -0800
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:45 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:47 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 17:57 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:06 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 18:08 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 19:45 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-01 21:33 +0100
Re: Not being a Haskell programmer is trendy! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-06 01:56 +0100
csiph-web