Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547724
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim |
| Date | 2016-01-24 06:16 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <uq6enc-ptc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <VIadnd38q_wkNT7LnZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> <5e0dnc-j29.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <dgioofF1hjuU1@mid.individual.net> <7rodnc-sib.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <dgj0plF37phU1@mid.individual.net> |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > On 24/01/2016 1:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >>> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your >>>> >>>> Why do you ignore copyrights? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as >>> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with >>> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large >>> as to amount to a substantial part of the original. >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> Sure it is if the entirety of the material is copied material. >> >> What is Fair Use? >> >> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted >> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to >> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work." >> >> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/ >> >> As the copyright violator in question never provides comment upon, >> critique, or parody, Q.E.D. >> >> > > You can't start at the end and work backwards. > > The issue of fair use only arises if the use would otherwise be a breach > of copyright. Not all uses are a breach of copyright, so your starting > point has to be the question of whether the particular use is a breach. > > Sylvia. If a copyright specifically states that the work may only be copied, without prior permission, for use within a commentary on the subject or a critque of the original work, and the copier does nothing but copy the original work absent any commentary or critque, it seems pretty clear to me that the copyright has been violated. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:32 -0600
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-22 17:59 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 12:43 -0600
The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:46 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 12:48 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:20 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:39 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 02:12 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:18 -0500
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-24 03:20 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim GogoJF <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 19:50 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim GogoJF <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 20:00 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:06 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-24 05:18 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 23:00 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 23:00 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:19 -0500
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 12:11 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-24 12:29 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:17 -0500
Re: Is is alive ? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:33 -0500
Re: Is is alive ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:41 +1100
Is is alive ? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-23 22:46 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 18:53 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:22 -0600
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:21 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:46 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 02:17 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:04 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 06:16 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:13 -0500
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2016-01-25 06:33 -0500
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:53 -0600
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:11 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 20:26 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 16:13 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 17:15 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:21 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 15:40 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 01:43 +0000
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:07 +1100
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:30 -0500
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-23 14:08 -0800
Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:08 -0500
csiph-web