Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.obituaries > #226970
| From | "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.obituaries |
| Subject | Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. |
| Date | 2024-02-06 04:10 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <upsbf2$madu$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <b45ccb6b-2c36-4efe-ba1d-0d8c83cae05cn@googlegroups.com> <XnsB10E83EC6A455hueydlltampabayrrcom@135.181.20.170> <upon2u$3p7h7$1@dont-email.me> <upsane$4i7$1@reader1.panix.com> |
Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> wrote: >Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote: >>>>Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>If one is diagnosed with a terminal disease and that one takes their >>>>>life, is it truly suicide? I know technically it is, but >>>>>philosophically? >>>>Yes, it is. That doesn't answer the question of whether you should do >>>>it, or have the right to do it, or have the right to go to a >>>>jurisdiction where they can do it for you. >>>Life is terminal if you wait for it to end. In some cases the end may come >>>sooner than expected. >>>As for taking your life, I have known many with difficult diagnoses and >>>they all chose to enjoy life for as long as possible. I believe they and >>>those around them were better off from that choice. Live while you can! >>>We only get to do this once. >>"enjoy life for as long as possible" >>But we're discussing the period at the end of life, well past the time >>that life is still enjoyable. >You're talking about giving up hope and surrendering to despair. >Where (but only where) there is life,there is hope. >The war of the living against death needs no traitors. I'd like to not die while in a coma.
Back to alt.obituaries | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
O.T. A Philosophical Question. Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 22:18 -0800
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-04 06:26 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. A Friend <nope@noway.com> - 2024-02-04 07:53 -0500
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2024-02-04 17:58 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-04 19:03 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 03:57 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 04:10 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 05:11 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 06:07 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 06:23 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 07:03 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. John M. <jcm1139TRASH@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 20:20 -0500
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. John M. <jcm1139TRASH@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 20:21 -0500
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-04 18:52 +0000
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> - 2024-02-04 13:38 -0600
Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Meteorite Debris <peter.gregory.kelly@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 22:59 -0800
csiph-web