Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.obituaries > #226968

Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question.

Show all headers | View raw

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>If one is diagnosed with a terminal disease and that one takes their
>>>>life, is it truly suicide?  I know technically it is, but
>>>>philosophically? 
>  
>>>Yes, it is.  That doesn't answer the question of whether you should do
>>>it, or have the right to do it, or have the right to go to a
>>>jurisdiction where they can do it for you.
> 
>>Life is terminal if you wait for it to end.  In some cases the end may come 
>>sooner than expected.
> 
>>As for taking your life, I have known many with difficult diagnoses and 
>>they all chose to enjoy life for as long as possible.  I believe they and 
>>those around them were better off from that choice.  Live while you can!  
>>We only get to do this once.
> 
> "enjoy life for as long as possible"
> 
> But we're discussing the period at the end of life, well past the time
> that life is still enjoyable.

You're talking about giving up hope and surrendering to despair.
Where (but only where) there is life,there is hope.
The war of the living against death needs no traitors.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.

Back to alt.obituaries | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

O.T. A Philosophical Question. Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 22:18 -0800
  Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-04 06:26 +0000
  Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. A Friend <nope@noway.com> - 2024-02-04 07:53 -0500
    Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2024-02-04 17:58 +0000
      Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-04 19:03 +0000
        Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 03:57 +0000
          Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 04:10 +0000
            Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 05:11 +0000
              Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 06:07 +0000
                Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-06 06:23 +0000
                Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-02-06 07:03 +0000
                Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. John M. <jcm1139TRASH@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 20:20 -0500
                Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. John M. <jcm1139TRASH@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 20:21 -0500
  Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-02-04 18:52 +0000
  Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> - 2024-02-04 13:38 -0600
  Re: O.T. A Philosophical Question. Meteorite Debris <peter.gregory.kelly@gmail.com> - 2024-02-07 22:59 -0800

csiph-web