Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732743
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree |
| Date | 2017-09-15 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <upT4S-7Zg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <upSVc-7Vq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <upSVb-7Vq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri 15-09-17 09:07:31, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 14-09-17 13:19:38, Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > Subject: include/linux/sched/mm.h: uninline mmdrop_async(), etc > > > > mmdrop_async() is only used in fork.c. Move that and its support > > functions into fork.c, uninline it all. > > Is this really an improvement? Why do we want to discourage more code > paths to use mmdrop_async? It sounds like a useful api and it has been > removed only because it lost its own user in oom code. Now that we have > a user I would just keep it where it was before. Dohh, I have mixed mmput_async with mmdrop_async. Anyway I still think that this is universal enough to have it in a header rather than hiding it in fork.c -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-15 09:10 +0200
Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-15 09:20 +0200
Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-15 20:10 +0200
Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-18 08:10 +0200
csiph-web