Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1733662

Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added to -mm tree
Date 2017-09-18 08:10 +0200
Message-ID <uqXpL-21S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <upSVc-7Vq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <upSVb-7Vq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <upT4S-7Zg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uq3dU-6zx-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri 15-09-17 11:05:20, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:12:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri 15-09-17 09:07:31, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 14-09-17 13:19:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > > Subject: include/linux/sched/mm.h: uninline mmdrop_async(), etc
> > > > 
> > > > mmdrop_async() is only used in fork.c.  Move that and its support
> > > > functions into fork.c, uninline it all.
> > > 
> > > Is this really an improvement? Why do we want to discourage more code
> > > paths to use mmdrop_async? It sounds like a useful api and it has been
> > > removed only because it lost its own user in oom code. Now that we have
> > > a user I would just keep it where it was before.
> > 
> > Dohh, I have mixed mmput_async with mmdrop_async. Anyway I still think
> > that this is universal enough to have it in a header rather than hiding
> > it in fork.c
> 
> Async free is a hack.  It consumes more resources (runtime and memory)
> than a synchronous free.  It introduces a risk of memory exhaustion
> when an unbounded number of async frees are pending, not yet serviced. 
> It introduces a risk of unbounded latency when an unbounded number of
> async frees are serviced by the kernel thread.

It is our standard technique of postponing an action to a more relaxed
context when we cannot afford an action from the current context.
 
> Synchronous frees are simply better, so we shouldn't encourage the use
> of async frees.

No questions about that. But we have a clear demand for the deferred
implementation as well. And we have learned that having our own
private, thing usually leads people to invent their own wheel.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added  to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-15 09:10 +0200
  Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added  to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-15 09:20 +0200
    Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added  to -mm tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-15 20:10 +0200
      Re: + include-linux-sched-mmh-uninline-mmdrop_async-etc.patch added  to -mm tree Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-09-18 08:10 +0200

csiph-web