Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1726045

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree

From Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
Date 2017-09-04 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <ulYZd-5A3-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ulMOl-6mU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:49:28 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0b89ede62963 ("s390/mm: fork vs. 5 level page tabel")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   f1c1174fa099 ("s390/mm: use new mm defines instead of magic values")
> 
> from the s390 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
 
Fixup looks fine, thank you!

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-09-04 01:50 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-09-04 14:50 +0200

csiph-web