Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1725787 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-04 01:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-04 14:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-09-04 01:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-09-04 14:50 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-04 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree |
| Message-ID | <ulMOl-6mU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
between commit:
0b89ede62963 ("s390/mm: fork vs. 5 level page tabel")
from Linus' tree and commit:
f1c1174fa099 ("s390/mm: use new mm defines instead of magic values")
from the s390 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 24bc41622a98,31eea6261488..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@@ -44,12 -45,7 +45,12 @@@ static inline int init_new_context(stru
mm->context.asce = __pa(mm->pgd) | _ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH |
_ASCE_USER_BITS | _ASCE_TYPE_REGION3;
break;
+ case -PAGE_SIZE:
+ /* forked 5-level task, set new asce with new_mm->pgd */
+ mm->context.asce = __pa(mm->pgd) | _ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH |
+ _ASCE_USER_BITS | _ASCE_TYPE_REGION1;
+ break;
- case 1UL << 53:
+ case _REGION1_SIZE:
/* forked 4-level task, set new asce with new mm->pgd */
mm->context.asce = __pa(mm->pgd) | _ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH |
_ASCE_USER_BITS | _ASCE_TYPE_REGION2;
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-04 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ulYZd-5A3-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725787 |
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:49:28 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 0b89ede62963 ("s390/mm: fork vs. 5 level page tabel")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> f1c1174fa099 ("s390/mm: use new mm defines instead of magic values")
>
> from the s390 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Fixup looks fine, thank you!
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web