Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1717038
| From | Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: qustion about eeh_add_virt_device |
| Date | 2017-08-22 07:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhaeB-6o2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ue2wV-8qw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 16:54 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hello,
Hello, sorry for the delayed response.
>
> At the suggestion of Christoph Hellwig, I am working on inlining the
> functions stored in the err_handler field of a pci_driver structure into
> the pci_driver structure itself. A number of functions in the file
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c have code like:
>
> if (!driver->err_handler ||
> !driver->err_handler->error_detected) {
> eeh_pcid_put(dev);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> This I would just convert to:
>
> if (!driver->error_detected) {
> eeh_pcid_put(dev);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> But I am not sure what is best to do about eeh_add_virt_device, which
> contains:
>
> if (driver->err_handler)
> return NULL;
>
> Should I try to find a subfield of the err_handler that is guaranteed to
> be there if anything is there? Or could the test just be dropped, leaving
> a direct return NULL?
I believe the test can be dropped.
- Russell
>
> thanks,
> julia
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
qustion about eeh_add_virt_device Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-08-13 17:00 +0200 Re: qustion about eeh_add_virt_device Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> - 2017-08-22 07:50 +0200
csiph-web