Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1716087
| From | Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method |
| Date | 2017-08-21 05:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ugLSV-7re-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ufGVj-6zL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ugfq2-42G-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 08/19/2017 12:05 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote: >> For ARM64, the locality is handled by Trust Zone in FW. >> The layout does not have crb_regs_head. It is hitting >> the following line. >> dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout"); >> >> Current code excludes CRB_FL_ACPI_START and when >> CRB_FL_CRB_SMC_START is added around the same time >> locality support is added, it should also be excluded. >> >> For goIdle and cmdReady where code was excluding >> CRB_FL_ACPI_START only (do nothing for ACPI start method), >> CRB_FL_CRB_SMC_START was also excluded as ARM64 SMC start >> method does not have TPM_CRB_CTRL_REQ. >> Change if confition to white list instead of black list. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> > > Is this v2? If so, where is the change log? Based on the previous comments, I now understand that because of Intel PTT bug workaround, it is not appropriate for the patch to have title/subject "Access locality for only CRB_START method" So the more descriptive patch title is "Access locality for only non-ACPI and non-SMC start method". Because the patch is changed, I thought I start a new series. Would you like me to tag this v3 and put change log even though patch title has changed? Thanks - Jiandi > > /Jarkko > -- Jiandi An Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-18 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-19 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-21 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-22 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-08-23 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-24 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-24 19:30 +0200
csiph-web