Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1717983
| From | Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method |
| Date | 2017-08-23 04:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uhtAC-2W7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ufGVj-6zL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uhltn-5B5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uhoUh-82K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:28:54PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote: > I'm sorry perhaps I didn't fully understand the workaround specific to Intel > PPT. In previous patch thread, you mentioned the following where > a platform could report to require start method 2 (ACPI start) which is > sm = ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD, and actually requires start method 8, which > is sm = ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD. I'm also not sure. To be clear, my desire to see a test that triggers only for the Intel chips with the problem, and is written in a way that matches exactly the ACPI data from the broken chip - so things like !CRB are not what I want to see.. In that light the example I gave was probably not well thought out, but I also do not understand the exact conditions needed for the Intel work around either. Hopefully Jarkko can clarify. Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-18 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-19 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-21 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-22 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-08-23 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-24 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-24 19:30 +0200
csiph-web