Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1717983

Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method

From Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method
Date 2017-08-23 04:30 +0200
Message-ID <uhtAC-2W7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ufGVj-6zL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uhltn-5B5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uhoUh-82K-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:28:54PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:

> I'm sorry perhaps I didn't fully understand the workaround specific to Intel
> PPT.  In previous patch thread, you mentioned the following where
> a platform could report to require start method 2 (ACPI start) which is
> sm = ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD, and actually requires start method 8, which
> is sm = ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD.

I'm also not sure.

To be clear, my desire to see a test that triggers only for the Intel
chips with the problem, and is written in a way that matches exactly
the ACPI data from the broken chip - so things like !CRB are not what
I want to see..

In that light the example I gave was probably not well thought out,
but I also do not understand the exact conditions needed for the Intel
work around either. Hopefully Jarkko can clarify.

Jason

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-18 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-19 19:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-21 05:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-22 19:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-22 23:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-08-23 04:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-24 14:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: Access locality for non-ACPI and non-SMC  start method Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-24 19:30 +0200

csiph-web