Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #189853

Re: unison compatibility in stretch

From Curt <curty@free.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: unison compatibility in stretch
Date 2017-12-13 16:50 +0100
Message-ID <uWhsd-2BX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <uVtF7-413-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVRo5-2x6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWeNH-Rm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWfqq-1ns-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWfTr-1O9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Unorganized

Show all headers | View raw


On 2017-12-13, Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>>
> It seems the unison developers are a little careless with compatibility
> issues. This situation has arisen previously, then overcome by unison-all.
>
> Thanks for your suggestion of syncthing; I'll give that a go...

Sorry for butting in once again, but you do have unison-all installed,
the metapackage which allows specifically for the -addversionno "kludge" by
bringing in versions 2.32 and 2.40 as per the following post curiously
similar to your case (two machines, one with Debian Jessie and one with
Debian Stretch)

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/233504/how-to-use-multiple-versions-of-unison-on-one-system

and then working around the eventual minor version number truncation
bug, if indeed it still exists, as per my previous cryptic message.

> Cheers, Tony
>
>


-- 
"The world is full of shipping clerks who have read the Harvard Classics."
— Charles Bukowski

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-10 13:30 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-10 15:10 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch "Juan R. de Silva" <juan.r.d.silva@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 16:40 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-10 20:50 +0100
    Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-11 11:40 +0100
      Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 10:00 +0100
        Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-12 11:20 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 13:40 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch David Margerison <deltam@electrosonics.com.au> - 2017-12-12 15:10 +0100
      Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-12 13:00 +0100
        Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 14:00 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-13 14:40 +0100
            Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 15:10 +0100
              Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-13 16:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 17:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2017-12-13 18:40 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 18:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-29 12:30 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-29 17:10 +0100

csiph-web