Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #189847
| From | Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: unison compatibility in stretch |
| Date | 2017-12-13 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uWeNH-Rm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uV8U2-7Bd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVfLP-3to-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVtF7-413-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVRo5-2x6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 12/12/17 11:58, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Monday, 11 Dec 2017 at 10:36, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > > [...] > >> No: >> >> tony@tony-lx:~$ unison -addversionno tony >> Contacting server... >> bash: unison-2.48: command not found > But you do need to install the various versions you may to use on the > server. Then the client can request to use the version that it has by > using that option. > > So install unison-2.48? > The server is running Jessie, the repository does not contain 2.48. There appears to be no backport. The client is running Stretch. Its repository does not contain anything other than 2.48. >From what I can see froom googling, there is an incompatibility in one of the underlying libraries (ocaml?), which prevents Unison 2.48 being built for Jessie, or Unison 2.40 being built for Stretch. There doesn't appear to be an alternative for both jessie and stretch. What a mess!
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-10 13:30 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-10 15:10 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch "Juan R. de Silva" <juan.r.d.silva@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 16:40 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-10 20:50 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-11 11:40 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 10:00 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-12 11:20 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 13:40 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch David Margerison <deltam@electrosonics.com.au> - 2017-12-12 15:10 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-12 13:00 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 14:00 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-13 14:40 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 15:10 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-13 16:50 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 17:50 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2017-12-13 18:40 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 18:50 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-29 12:30 +0100
Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-29 17:10 +0100
csiph-web