Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #189774

Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd

From David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd
Date 2017-12-11 06:10 +0100
Message-ID <uVovL-OD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uTQcO-62s-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVhXj-53v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVk8N-6lI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVn6G-8hi-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 22:17:12 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 10 December 2017 19:02:49 David Wright wrote:
> 
> > On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 16:43:02 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Sunday 10 December 2017 14:12:09 David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 10:42:53 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > > For something that can be such a pita, not installing the docs
> > > > > doesn't seem like my error, they should have been part of the
> > > > > install. IMO.
> > > >
> > > > That's ridiculous. I don't want all the docs on all the
> > > > installations. I only install docs on the machines that either I'm
> > > > going to read it on or one with a big disk.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > David.
> > >
> > > While I do have spinning rust drives of a terrabyte on both of those
> > > credit card sized machines, functioning as swaps and work areas,
> > > they are still booting and running from a 32GB sd chip disk.
> >
> > …whereas the two laptops I mainly type into have respectively 60 and
> > 80 GB disks of rust. Both have two root filesystems with different
> > versions of Debian. The smaller drive's PC needs a swap partition to
> > function, the other needs one for hibernation. Not a lot of space
> > left for /home. Installing shedloads of docs for each person's PITA
> > would contravene Debian's sensible policies.
> >
> This I'd guess is important, if you have several users. I don't, except 
> for amanda and nut, and thats only on this machine. All the rest have 
> one user, me, known under various aliases

That's not what I meant.

You find polkit a PITA, so you want Debian to install the docs
automatically when you install the package.

Someone else finds ntp a PITA, so they lobby Debian for ntp's docs.

"What about rsyslog?" says somebody else. "That should have the
same treatment; it's a PITA."

Debian's answer: if you want the docs for foo, then install foo-doc,
but don't force them onto others by making them a dependency of foo.

>                                           because the idiot installer is 
> now set to give the first user the machines name like pi or rock64. I 
> spent a month trying to fix user 1000 to be me instead of pi on the pi.

Have you tried setting the hostname to "gene" whenever you install
onto a new machine, and then changing *its* name to pi or rock64
afterwards. That might be easier.

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Embarrassing security bug in systemd Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de> - 2017-12-06 23:20 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-06 23:50 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-12-07 00:40 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 03:50 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-07 07:30 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-12-06 23:50 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2017-12-07 10:40 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2017-12-07 11:30 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 11:50 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-09 03:50 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 17:50 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 10:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-10 20:40 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-07 11:40 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 16:00 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 20:30 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-08 09:20 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-08 12:40 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-08 13:40 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-08 21:40 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-08 17:10 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-08 19:10 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Menelaos Maglis <mmaglis@metacom.gr> - 2017-12-08 19:40 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Menelaos Maglis <mmaglis@metacom.gr> - 2017-12-08 19:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-08 20:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-08 21:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-09 09:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 11:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-09 19:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-12-09 20:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 22:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 00:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-10 10:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 11:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-10 12:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 16:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 15:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-09 21:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 21:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-08 21:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-12-08 22:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-12-09 02:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-12-09 06:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-09 09:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-12-09 09:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-12-15 13:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-15 14:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-12-15 16:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-08 21:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-08 22:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-12-09 00:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-09 10:00 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dave Sherohman <dave@sherohman.org> - 2017-12-08 10:00 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-08 23:40 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-09 00:30 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 01:20 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-09 11:40 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 15:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-12-10 01:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-10 22:20 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-09 17:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 18:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-09 21:20 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-10 12:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-10 17:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-10 20:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-10 21:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-10 23:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 00:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-11 00:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 12:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-11 13:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-11 14:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-10 21:50 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2017-12-11 13:00 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-11 13:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 16:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-10 23:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 01:30 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-11 04:40 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 06:10 +0100
                Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-12-11 07:40 +0100
                Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-12-11 15:40 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing  security bug in systemd) Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-12-11 16:00 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-12-11 18:30 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing  security bug in systemd) Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-11 16:30 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2017-12-11 17:40 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-11 20:10 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-12 09:30 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2017-12-12 17:30 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-12-12 17:50 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 18:20 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2017-12-13 04:40 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-12-11 18:30 +0100
                Re: Rust? (and a wordsmithing question) (was: Re: Embarrassing  security bug in systemd) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-12 19:10 +0100
                UID 1000 on Raspberry Pi (Was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in  systemd) Jason <electron@emypeople.net> - 2018-01-09 05:10 +0100
                Re: UID 1000 on Raspberry Pi (Was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in  systemd) Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org> - 2018-01-09 16:00 +0100
                Re: UID 1000 on Raspberry Pi (Was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in  systemd) Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-09 16:30 +0100
                Re: UID 1000 on Raspberry Pi (Was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in  systemd) Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org> - 2018-01-09 18:10 +0100
                Re: UID 1000 on Raspberry Pi (Was: Re: Embarrassing security bug in  systemd) Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-01-10 04:50 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Menelaos Maglis <mmaglis@metacom.gr> - 2017-12-09 01:40 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-12-09 03:10 +0100
              Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-09 10:50 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-12-09 16:40 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> - 2017-12-09 17:10 +0100
            Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-12-09 22:10 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-09 18:20 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 00:00 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-07 09:40 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-12-07 00:10 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-12-07 00:10 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 03:50 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-12-07 00:20 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2017-12-07 00:50 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 01:20 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 03:50 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-07 02:10 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2017-12-07 03:40 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-07 08:30 +0100
    Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-12-07 00:50 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2017-12-07 02:40 +0100
      Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Menelaos Maglis <mmaglis@metacom.gr> - 2017-12-08 10:40 +0100
        Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-08 13:40 +0100
          Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-08 20:10 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-12-07 01:10 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-07 08:30 +0100
  Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd David Baron <dbaron770@gmail.com> - 2017-12-07 08:50 +0100

csiph-web