Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #189405
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot |
| Date | 2017-11-29 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uRf7H-4Jk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <uLzCa-5Vz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uMxeV-2Wt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uMy1k-3st-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uMyNH-3Z8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uReY2-4Gg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | JRE Trading Ltd |
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:07:01 -0500 Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> wrote: > On 11/16/2017 03:13 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > > Joe composed on 2017-11-16 19:27 (UTC): > > > >> I see the date of the page is 2015, > > IIRC, that 2015 update was all about updating and/or replacing > > broken links. > >> Multiple OSes will still use one overall bootloader, which may or > >> may not redirect to other bootloaders. It is common, therefore, to > >> use a single physical partition for /boot, common to all *nix > >> OSes.... > > Mounting the same single primary partition as /boot to all *nix > > OSes invites virtually the same trouble that installing Grub to MBR > > causes. Absent user intervention, each OS thinks it owns the space, > > so at updates times, each stomps on whatever is there at the time, > > eventually exhausting its freespace with a multitude of diverse > > kernels and initrds. Only one OS, or no OS, should mount the > > bootable physical partition to /boot. Others can either have their > > own bootloader installed to their own / filesystem, or be used > > without their own bootloader. > > > > On most of my PCs, the bootable primary is never mounted to /boot. > > I manage it manually myself, providing direct loading of kernels > > and initrds, as well as chainloading entries, and configfile > > entries, the latter two used primarily when prior kernels are to be > > booted, the former for most booting. > > > > For someone doing multiboot the first time, it's easiest, if not a > > requirement, for the first installation to have the primary mounted > > to /boot. The subsequent installations either need to have no > > bootloader or bootloader only installed to /; or, the newer can be > > configured to mount the primary on /boot, and the original, prior > > to its next boot, preferably immediately prior to starting the new > > installation, reconfigured to not mount the primary on /boot, not > > manage the bootloader installed there, and relocate its content to > > its own / filesystem. > > After POST, the following appears: > > [...] > PXE-E53: No boot filename received > PXE-MOF: Exiting PXE ROM. > ERROR:No boot disk has been detected or the disk has failed. > > Isn't that because the primary is not mounted to /boot? > > Sorry to be so dense, but how do I "have the primary mounted > to /boot?" > > > > Multiboot setup is complex, one of the reasons why virtualization > > became popular. There is no single right way to get where you want > > to go. For a beginner it helps a lot to have an extra PC to do the > > learning, and for doc access while doing the installations and > > configurations on the other. :-) >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 04:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-13 07:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 16:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-13 20:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 21:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 00:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-14 01:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 03:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-14 04:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 04:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-16 19:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-16 20:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-16 23:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-16 20:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-16 21:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 19:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 19:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 19:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 19:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 21:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 22:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 22:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-30 03:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 22:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 23:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-17 00:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 10:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-13 20:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 00:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-14 00:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2017-11-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 17:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2017-11-13 21:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 13:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 17:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 18:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 17:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-13 20:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 08:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 10:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 19:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 20:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 20:40 +0100
csiph-web