Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #189049
| From | Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot |
| Date | 2017-11-17 00:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uMBix-5oq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <uLxAl-4Kp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uLziN-5OK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uLzCa-5Vz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uMxeV-2Wt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uMy1k-3st-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/16/2017 02:27 PM, Joe wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:34:52 -0500 > Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> wrote: > >> On 11/13/2017 09:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote: >>> Dan Norton composed on 2017-11-13 21:38 (UTC-0500): >>> >>>> How do you set up LVM so that install does not clobber one of the >>>> siblings? During installation, for partitioning, do you pick >>>> "Manual" or "Guided -*" ? >>> I don't think I've ever used Debian's, or any Debian derivative's, >>> "guided". I can't remember the last time I didn't pick manual, >>> after *fully* preparing in advance to my specifications. >>> >>> Manual will list what partitions and volumes exist, so if you've >>> fully prepared logical volumes in advance, all that should need to >>> be done within manual is select mount points and mount options for >>> those you wish used. If volumes exist but are not formatted, then >>> formatting would be a third selection using manual. >> A better description of what I want is "multiboot", instead of "dual >> boot" in this thread. I can see having up to 4 systems installed, all >> Debians, on one disk drive. There is an item in [1] which I see that >> reads: >> >> 6. Disable LVM support >> >> which is puzzling. Can multiboot be set up within LVM on one disk >> drive? Or, is it necessary to disable LVM, define multiple logical >> partitions with fdisk or parted for example, install in these >> partitions, and then set up LVM separately on each system? > I see the date of the page is 2015, but to be honest, a lot of this > page is completely obsolete, even more so if you're not using DOS, OS/2 > or early Windows. I would not even swear that item 6, LVM, even refers > to the Linux system. There's certainly no problem about mixing multiple > booting with lvm. Glad to hear it! > > A volume group would normally be declared within a single old-style IBM > partition, but doesn't have to be. Think of multiple hard drives, each > containing multiple old-style partitions, then think of multiple lvm > volume groups, each with multiple volumes, roughly overlaid on the > drives and partitions but not physically matching them. A volume group > can consist of multiple complete partitions on different drives, and > the volumes it contains need not bear any relationship to the > underlying partitions. > > Multiple OSes will still use one overall bootloader, which may or may > not redirect to other bootloaders. It is common, therefore, to use a > single physical partition for /boot, common to all *nix OSes, but by no > means necessary. /boot can be an LVM volume if you wish, but a booting > problem is slightly easier to deal with if the kernel and grub stuff is > in a standard partition, you don't need to worry about looking up the > lvm commands in addition to the grub set. > > My workstation, for example, has a 1GB primary partition for /boot, and > the rest of the drive is a second primary partition which maps exactly > to a volume group. The volume group is then divided into volumes, which > mostly act like old-style partitions, at least as far as mounting goes. > You can have a lot of them. Apparently there are many ways to do multiboot in LVM. Is it practical to, on one fairly large (1TB) disk, [I can hear the snickers when someone reads this when 1TB is puny in a year or two] do the following: 1. Enlarge the volume group to span the entire disk (it's currently 40G). 2. Define a number of additional logical volumes, say 3. 3. Install stable in one of the lv's and have install treat it like a standard *partition* (logical) and have within it separate root, swap, /var, /tmp, and /home? - Dan > > > I have two drives set up the same, as I migrated from one to a newer > one. After adjustment, the grub installation of the new drive handles > the boot, and the kernel used by the old system lives in the /boot > partition of the old drive. All of this could have been integrated into > one volume group, but it's two because that's how the system evolved. I > could pull the old drive, which I hardly ever touch now, plonk it into > another PC and boot it with minimal fiddling about. > > So you have a common grub, basically from the latest installation > unless you tell the installer otherwise, and before the installation is > finished it should have detected any other bootable OSes anywhere in > the hardware. You've been advised not to share other partitions, even > /home, but several /homes can live in differently-named lvm volumes in > the same volume group. Or not, by your preference. You can, for the > most part, treat volumes as partitions, and not worry about whether > they are primary or logical. > > You should probably track down a few tutorials on multiboot and lvm, > read through them to get a feel for what needs doing. It's always > difficult reading a manual for something and working out from that what > steps you need to take to do something. Things like UEFI boot and disc > encryption complicate things, so probably best to avoid them on your > first attempt(s) if the hardware allows. If you're starting with a bare > drive and your BIOS allows old-style IBM partitioning, that's the way > to go to get the hang of this. >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 04:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-13 07:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 16:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-13 20:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 21:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 00:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-14 01:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 03:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-14 04:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 04:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-16 19:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-16 20:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-16 23:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-16 20:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-16 21:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 19:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 19:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 19:50 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 19:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 21:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 22:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 22:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-30 03:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 22:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 23:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-17 00:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-11-29 10:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-13 20:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-14 00:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-11-14 00:40 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2017-11-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 17:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2017-11-13 21:30 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 13:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-11-13 17:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 18:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-13 17:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-13 20:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 04:20 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 08:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-11-29 10:10 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Dan Norton <dnorton@mindspring.com> - 2017-11-29 19:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 20:00 +0100
Re: Debian 8 and Debian 9 Dual Boot Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-11-29 20:40 +0100
csiph-web