Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1701523

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:15:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> > /*
> >  * The full memory barrier implied by mm_cpumask update operations
> >  * is required by the membarrier system call.
> >  */
> >
> > What we want to order here is:
> >
> > prev userspace memory accesses
> > schedule
> >   <full mb> (it's already there) [A]
> >   update to rq->curr changing the rq->curr->mm value
> >   <full mb> (provided by mm_cpumask updates in switch_mm on x86) [B]
> 
> If I understand this right, the issue with relying on CR3 writes is
> that the target CPU could switch to a kernel thread and back to the
> same user mm white the membarrier caller is reading its mm, right?

The thing that got my attention was your patch removing the load_cr3().
Ah, looking closer, it appears that you have not eliminated the CR3
load, but just renamed it to write_cr3().  So if there is always still
a CR3 load, you are right, I should be able to simply move the comment.
Or let you insert the comment into your patch?

So there is still always a CR3 load, correct?  (Hey, I thought that
maybe x86 was moving to ASIDs or some such.)

							Thanx, Paul

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-31 18:20 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 02:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 06:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 06:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 18:40 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 15:50 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-01 16:00 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 16:10 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 17:50 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 23:40 +0200

csiph-web