Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1701079

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Date 2017-08-01 16:00 +0200
Message-ID <u9FSj-4Gv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u9a25-15b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9lAe-8rv-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9sV4-4wv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9wFj-6QY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9FIC-4Dg-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:43:14AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Anyway, can you document whatever property you require with a comment
> in switch_mm() or wherever you're finding that property so that future
> arch changes don't break it?

We need _a_ smp_mb after rq->curr store. x86 has plenty.

> > +static void membarrier_private_expedited(void)
> > +{
> > +       int cpu;
> > +       bool fallback = false;
> > +       cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
> > +
> > +       if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Matches memory barriers around rq->curr modification in
> > +        * scheduler.
> > +        */
> > +       smp_mb();       /* system call entry is not a mb. */
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Expedited membarrier commands guarantee that they won't
> > +        * block, hence the GFP_NOWAIT allocation flag and fallback
> > +        * implementation.
> > +        */
> > +       if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&tmpmask, GFP_NOWAIT)) {
> > +               /* Fallback for OOM. */
> > +               fallback = true;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       cpus_read_lock();
> > +       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +               struct task_struct *p;
> > +
> > +               /*
> > +                * Skipping the current CPU is OK even through we can be
> > +                * migrated at any point. The current CPU, at the point
> > +                * where we read raw_smp_processor_id(), is ensured to
> > +                * be in program order with respect to the caller
> > +                * thread. Therefore, we can skip this CPU from the
> > +                * iteration.
> > +                */
> > +               if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
> > +                       continue;
> > +               rcu_read_lock();
> > +               p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
> > +               if (p && p->mm == current->mm) {
> 
> I'm a bit surprised you're iterating all CPUs instead of just CPUs in
> mm_cpumask().

Because ARM64 doesn't set any bits at all in there.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-31 18:20 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 02:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 06:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 06:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 18:40 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 15:50 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-01 16:00 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 16:10 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-01 16:20 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-01 17:50 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 23:40 +0200

csiph-web